The Influence of Differences in Solvents and Concentration on the Efficacy of Propofol at Induction of Anesthesia

Author:

Obata Yukako1,Adachi Yushi U.2,Suzuki Katsumi3,Itagaki Taiga4,Kato Hiromi1,Satomoto Maiko5,Nakajima Yoshiki1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Intensive Care Unit, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 4313192, Japan

2. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Medical Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

3. Department of Anesthesia, Enshu Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan

4. Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA

5. Department of Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan

Abstract

Background. Propofol is a popular intravenous anesthetic and varieties of formulations were produced from different laboratories. The present study compared efficacy of propofol of different laboratories and different concentrations (1 and 2%) during induction of anesthesia.Methods. Seventy-five scheduled surgical patients were randomly allocated into three groups. The patients of group D1 received AstraZeneca Diprivan 1% (Osaka, Japan) at a rate of 40 mg kg−1 h−1. Group M1 was given 1% Maruishi (Maruishi Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan) and group M2 was given 2% formulation at the same rate of propofol. Achieving hypnosis was defined as failure to open their eyes in response to a verbal command and the venous blood sample was withdrawn.Results. The hypnotic doses of M2 were significantly larger (D1:91.4±30.9, M1:90.7±26.7, and M2:118.4±40.2 mg, resp. (mean ± SD).p<0.005). Age and gender were selected as statistically significant covariates using general linear model-ANOVA. The blood concentration showed no significant difference among the groups (3.73±2.34,4.10±3.04, and4.70±2.12μg mL−1, resp.).Conclusion. The required dose of propofol was different among the formulations; however, the serum concentration showed no significant difference. This trial is registered with UMIN Clinical Trial Registry:UMIN000019925.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3