Role of the Emphysema Index Combined with the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test Score in the Evaluation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Author:

Ding Qi1,Wei Xia1ORCID,Li Jie1,Gao Yan-Zhong2,Xu Shu-Di1,Yu Nan3,Mi Jiu-Yun1,Mi Bai-Bing4,Guo You-Min5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Ninth Hospital of Xi’an Affiliated with Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China

2. Department of Radiology, The Ninth Hospital of Xi’an Affiliated with Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China

3. Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital with Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi 712046, China

4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Centre, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China

5. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China

Abstract

Background. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the emphysema index (EI) in distinguishing chronic bronchitis (CB) from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and its role, combined with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, in the evaluation of COPD. Methods. A total of 92 patients with CB and 277 patients with COPD were enrolled in this study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed to evaluate whether the EI can preliminarily distinguish chronic bronchitis from COPD. Considering the heterogeneity of COPD, there might be missed diagnosis of some patients with bronchitis type when differentiating COPD patients only by EI. Therefore, patients with COPD were classified according to the CAT score and EI into four groups: Group 1 (EI < 16%, CAT < 10), Group 2 (EI < 16%, CAT ≥ 10), Group 3 (EI ≥ 16%, CAT < 10), and Group 4 (EI ≥ 16%, CAT ≥ 10). The records of pulmonary function and quantitative computed tomography findings were retrospectively analyzed. Results. ROC curve analysis showed that EI = 16.2% was the cutoff value for distinguishing COPD from CB. Groups 1 and 2 exhibited significantly higher maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) percent predicted (pred), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC), maximal midexpiratory flow of 25–75% pred, carbon monoxide-diffusing capacity (DLCO)/alveolar ventilation (VA), FEV1 % pred p 0.013 , and maximal expiratory flow 50% pred (all p < 0.05 ) than Group 4. FEV1/FVC and DLCO/VA were significantly lower in Group 3 than in Group 2 ( p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 , respectively). The residual volume/total lung capacity was higher in Group 3 than in Groups 1 and 2 p < 0.05 . Conclusions. The combination of EI and CAT was effective in the evaluation of COPD.

Funder

Shaanxi Province Social Development Science and Technology Research Project

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3