Affiliation:
1. King’s College London, London, UK
Abstract
In England, “easements,” introduced via the Coronavirus Act 2020, were brought in at the start of the pandemic to support English local authority adult social care services. They enabled local authorities to suspend some of their mandatory duties under the Care Act 2014. Easements were only adopted by eight local authorities and for short periods, and the provision was rescinded in late 2021. This article examines why a sample of 16 local authorities, some of which were statistically close to the eight local authorities that did decide to use easements, decided not to do so. It draws on data from interviews undertaken in 2021 with Directors of Adult Services and Principal Social Workers that explored their decision-making about using easements. It also outlines their preparations prior to the pandemic reaching England, how they had operated using “flexibilities” within the Care Act thus not needing to adopt easements, and their views on those authorities that had adopted them.
Funder
NIHR School for Primary Care Research
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference29 articles.
1. Coronavirus bill: summary of impacts;Department of Health and Social Care,2020
2. Guidance: Care Act easements: guidance for local authorities;Department of Health and Social Care,2020
3. Responding to COVID-19: the ethical framework for adult social care;Department of Health and Social Care,2020
4. Adult social care provision under pressure:Lessons from the pandemic;J. V. McHale,2021
5. Ethical framework for adult social care in COVID-19
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献