Author:
Geavlete Bogdan, , ,Popescu Razvan-Ionut,Multescu Razvan,Iordache Valentin,Popa Gelu-Adrian,Georgescu Dragos,Geavlete Petrisor, , , , , , , , , , ,
Abstract
A staged ureteroscopic procedure is generally preferred to treat bilateral renal stones. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of bilateral same-session flexible ureteroscopy (BS-fURS) in renal stones. A total of 81 patients underwent bilateral BS-fURS between March 2014 and March 2021 for bilateral renal stones. The mean stone burden per patient was 17±4 (range 7–27 mm). The average stone density was 1240 HU (970 to 1510). We used 4 types of ureteroscopes: Olympus URF-V2 (34 cases), Storz Flex X2 (30 cases), single-use PUSEN PU 3022 (12 cases), and single-use PUSEN – PU 3033A (5 cases). We specifically set our Holmium laser for dusting, pop-corning, and fragmenting. We found 31 calcium oxalate monohydrate cases, 11 calcium oxalate dehydrate cases, 17 uric acid cases, and 22 magnesium ammonium phosphate cases. The mean operating time was 77 min. (range 52 to 85) for both renal units. The SFRs were evaluated between 1 and 3 months with computed tomography (fragments >3 mm were defined as residual). Double J stenting (6Fr.) was applied bilaterally in 8 cases (9.87%) and unilateral in 34 cases (41.97%). The overall SFRs after 1 and 2 procedures were 81.48% (66/81 cases) and 92.59% (75/81 cases), respectively. Postoperative complications after an overall 96 procedures were Clavien I-II (18.75%) and Clavien III (3.12%). Urinary tract infections were observed in 13 cases (16.04%) without any case of urosepsis. Our experience suggested some BS-fURS advantages as a single anesthetic session and potentially reduced cost associated with treatment. BS-fURS seem feasible, especially for medium-sized bilateral renal stones in high-volume centers.
Publisher
S.C. JURNALUL PENTRU MEDICINA SI VIATA S.R.L
Reference34 articles.
1. 1. Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS; Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052.
2. 2. Hesse A, Brändle E, Wilbert D, Köhrmann KU, Alken P. Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol. 2003 Dec;44(6):709-13. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00415-9.
3. 3. Lee SLJ, Koh LT, Ng KK, Ng FC. Incidence of Computed Tomography (CT) detected urolithiasis; 2012. Available from: http://www.esdconference.com/ESD2012/pdf/POSTERS/PP-081.pdf [cited 2017, Apr 5].
4. 4. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarika K, et al. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. 2016. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/
5. 5. Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK. Worldwide Trends of Urinary Stone Disease Treatment Over the Last Two Decades: A Systematic Review. J Endourol. 2017 Jun;31(6):547-556. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0895.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献