Sposoby przedstawiania relacji człowiek-zwierzę w tekstach z XX i XXI wieku

Author:

Mikołajczak-Matyja NawojaORCID

Abstract

The aim of the article is to reveal how the human-animal relationship is reflected in real linguistic utterances made in Polish. 2,813 sentences from the National Corpus of Polish, in which the words człowiek / ludzie (person / people) and zwierzę (animal) co-occur, were analysed. On the basis of direct contexts, a dozen groups of sentences were distinguished, reflecting different ways of perceiving the relationship in question: from equating the two, through varying degrees of indicating the similarities and differences between humans and animals, to a clear emphasis on distinction between them. It was found that speakers most often indicate humans and animals as playing different roles — performers vs. recipients — in various activities and experiences. Speakers also often emphasise the strong similarities between humans and animals, particularly often referring jointly to both human and animal in their utterances, but as separate objects. Sentences equating humans with animals account for only about 8% of the analysed set.

Publisher

Institute of Political Studies - Polish Academy of Sciences

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Polymers and Plastics,Business and International Management

Reference27 articles.

1. Davies Matt, 2012, A New Approach to Oppositions in Discourse: The Role of Syntactic Frames in the Triggering of Noncanonical Oppositions, „Journal of English Linguistics”, t. 40(1), s. 41–73.

2. Davies Matt, 2013, Oppositions and Ideology in News Discourse, Bloomsbury Academic, London.

3. Fidler Kajetana, 2005, Człowiek — zwierzę, Człowiek — maszyna. Subiektywna historia ewolucji Homo sapiens sapiens, w: Adriana Celińska, Kajetana Fidler (red.), Człowiek — zwierzę, człowiek — maszyna, Stowarzyszenie Antropologiczne „Archipelagi Kultury”, Kraków, s. 269–280.

4. Górski Rafał L., Łaziński Marek, 2012a, Typologia tekstów w NKJP, w: Adam Przepiórkowski, Mirosław Bańko, Rafał L. Górski, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (red.), Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN (http://nkjp.pl/settings/papers/NKJP ksiazka.pdf, s. 13–23 [dostęp: 08.2022–09.2022]).

5. Górski Rafał L., Łaziński Marek, 2012b, Reprezentatywność i zrównoważenie korpusu, w: Adam Przepiórkowski, Mirosław Bańko, Rafał L. Górski, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (red.), Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN (http://nkjp.pl/settings/papers/NKJP ksiazka.pdf, s. 25–36 [dostęp: 08.2022–09.2022]).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3