Abstract
Hans Kelsen is a famous figure in the positivist school, which puts forward the concept of pure law (the pure theory of law) in the concept Hans Kelsen provides two legal theories, namely static law (nomostatics) and dynamic law (nomodinamics). The purpose of this research is to understand the two legal theories put forward by Hans Kelsen, about static and dynamic law. The method used in this research is the normative juridical method with secondary legal materials in the form of books and journals that have a relevant research focus. Nomostatics legal theory is the law as a system of norms that apply, law in its resting state while nomodynamics legal theory is the process when the law is created and applied and the law is in running condition. In using a legal theory as a basis for making a law, it is necessary to be as clear as possible about the theory in the hope that the legal theory remains relevant for the next few years so that a legal theory truly follows its purpose, namely to know legal acts and to assess these acts. A legal theory is not always perfect in terms of its relevance to the times.
Publisher
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Krisnadwipayana
Reference15 articles.
1. Asshiddiqie, J., & Safa'at, M. A. (2006). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
2. Fauzan, A. (2022). Kritik Dasar Aliran Positivisme Teori Hans Kelsen (Studi Kasus Terhadap Polemik Legalisasi Ganja di Indonesia). At-Tanwir Law Review, 2(2), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.31314/atlarev.v2i2.2025.
3. Hakim, N. A. (2018). Titik Taut Relevansi Pemikiran Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum Bagi Pembangunan Konsep Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.59635/jihk.v5i1.112.
4. Haris, O. K. (2014). Aspek Hukum Pidana Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Perizinan di Bidang Pertambangan. Yuridika, 29(3), 346-360. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v29i3.376.
5. Humiati, H. (2020). Komentar Terhadap Hukum dan Masyarakat Dalam Pemikiran John Austin, H.L.A. Hart dan Hans Kelsen. Yurijaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 3(1), 160-185. https://doi.org/10.51213/yurijaya.v3i1.38.