Talking about end-of-life care in a timely manner

Author:

Smeenk Frank W.J.M.,Schrijver Laurien A.,van Bavel Hennie C.J.,van de Laar Eric F.J.

Abstract

In 2014, a group of physicians of the Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven (The Netherlands) started a project called “Talking about end-of-life care in a timely manner”. Just like others in the country, the Eindhoven group noticed that regularly, very frail elderly people were admitted to hospital in acute situations without there ever having been conversations about their wishes concerning treatment options at the end of life. The project aimed to prevent unnecessary admissions and treatments for these frail patients by stimulating physicians, patients and informal caregivers to start conversations about end-of-life care together at an earlier stage. The first phase of the project consisted of research: a study of the relevant literature on previous projects on the matter and a small empirical study in the Eindhoven region. This yielded as the most important causes of the delay of these conversations: the factors of timing (when is the right moment?), reserve (because of the potential emotional despair of the patient) and hope (who am I to rob a patient of their hope?).In the second phase of the project, several approaches were developed to help caregivers, patients and informal caregivers with the planning and execution of conversations about 
end-of-life care. Meetings were organised for patients and informal caregivers to foster awareness and to provide information. For caregivers, information was provided (via symposia and an app) and specifically designed training sessions were developed. The training sessions consist of reflection on the caregivers’ personal choices with regard to end-of-life care (research has shown that caregivers choose less intensive medical treatments at the end of life) and of practising with the known complicating factors of timing, reserve and hope, and the different ways of thinking and talking about death and dying (typology of death and dying).Educational aimsTo understand the importance of discussing end-of-life care preferences with your patients at the appropriate time.To become aware of the possible interfering factors of timing, reserve and hope in talking about end-of-life care.Key pointsUsing the Surprise Question may be a useful tool in determining the appropriate moment to discuss this with your patients.By talking with your patients about end-of-life care in a timely manner, unnecessary and unwanted treatment can be prevented.Constraints of doctors to implement this in their practice can be overcome by implementing a training session as described in this article.Collaboration between primary and secondary care on this issue is strongly recommended in order to assure the care continuum maximally.

Publisher

European Respiratory Society (ERS)

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Reference12 articles.

1. ‘De arts staat in de behandelmodus’. Ook patienten leggen zich vaak niet neer bij de dood. [The doctor is in treatment-mode. Patients also often do not accept death.];Visser;Med Contact,2012

2. Huisartsen durven confrontatie behandeling niet aan. MedNet-peiling over de grens van een behandeling, [GPs are afraid to discuss treatment options. MedNet-poll on the bounderies of treatments.];Beelen van;MedNet,2014

3. Freedom from the Tyranny of Choice — Teaching the End-of-Life Conversation

4. van de Laar E , van der Aa G , Naus K , et al. Communicatie over ingrijpende keuzes. Een beschouwing aan de hand van het project ‘Tijdig spreken over het levenseinde’. [Communication in making profound choices. An analysis through the project ‘Talking about end-of-life care in a timely manner’.] In: Smeenk F , Rutten H , van de Laar E , eds. Toegewijde dokters. Waarom de niet-medische competenties geen bijzaak zijn. [Dedicated doctors. Why the non-medical competencies are no less important.] Antwerpen/Apeldoorn, Catharina-reeks, 2016; pp. 592–597.

5. Murray K . Doctors really do die differently. Research says that more physicians plan ahead, reject CPR and die in peace. www.zocalopublicsquare.org/2012/07/23/doctors-really-do-die-differently/ideas/nexus/ Date last updated: July 23, 2012.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3