A Frame of Reference for Assessing the Intensity of Exertional Dyspnoea During Incremental Cycle Ergometry

Abstract

Assessment of dyspnoea severity during incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has long been hampered by the lack of reference ranges as a function of work rate (WR) and ventilation (V̇E). This is particularly relevant to cycling, a testing modality which overtaxes the leg muscles leading to a heightened sensation of leg discomfort.Reference ranges based on dyspnoea percentiles (0–10 Borg scale) at standardised WRs and V̇E were established in 275 apparently healthy subjects aged 20–85 (131 men). They were compared with values recorded in a randomly selected “validation” sample (N=451, 224 men). Their usefulness in properly uncovering the severity of exertional dyspnoea were tested in 167 subjects under investigation for chronic dyspnoea (“testing sample”) who terminated CPET due to leg discomfort (86 men).Iso-WR and, to a lesser extent, iso-V̇E reference ranges (5th–25th, 25th–50th, 50–75th and 75th–95th percentiles) increased as a function of age, being systematically higher in women (p<0.01). There was no significant differences in percentiles distribution between “reference” and “validation” samples (p>0.05). Submaximal dyspnoea-WR scores lied within the 75th–95th or >95th percentiles in 108/118 (91.5%) subjects of the “testing” sample who showed physiological abnormalities known to elicit exertional dyspnoea i.e., ventilatory inefficiency and/or critical inspiratory constraints. In contrast, dyspnoea scores typically lied in the 5th–50th range in subjects without those abnormalities (p<0.001).This frame of reference might prove useful to uncover the severity of exertional dyspnoea in subjects who otherwise would be labeled as “non-dyspneic” while providing mechanistic insights into the genesis of this distressing symptom.