Best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data

Author:

Cividini SofiaORCID,Sinha IanORCID,Donegan SarahORCID,Maden MichelleORCID,Rose KatieORCID,Fulton OliviaORCID,Culeddu GiovannaORCID,Hughes Dyfrig A.ORCID,Turner StephenORCID,Tudur Smith CatrinORCID

Abstract

BackgroundThere is uncertainty about the best treatment option for children/adolescents with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and international guidelines make different recommendations. We evaluated the pharmacological treatments to reduce asthma exacerbations and symptoms in uncontrolled patients age <18 years on ICS.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals, National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment series, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, conference abstracts and internal clinical trial registers (1 July 2014 to 5 May 2023) for randomised controlled trials of participants age <18 years with uncontrolled asthma on any ICS dose alone at screening. Studies before July 2014 were retrieved from previous systematic reviews/contact with authors. Patients had to be randomised to any dose of ICS alone or combined with long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), LTRA alone, theophylline or placebo. Primary outcomes were exacerbation and asthma control. The interventions evaluated were ICS (low/medium/high dose), ICS+LABA, ICS+LTRA, LTRA alone, theophylline and placebo.ResultsOf the 4708 publications identified, 144 trials were eligible. Individual participant data were obtained from 29 trials and aggregate data were obtained from 19 trials. Compared with ICS Low, ICS Medium+LABA was associated with the lowest odds of exacerbation (OR 0.44, 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) 0.19–0.90) and with an increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean difference 0.71, 95% CrI 0.35–1.06). Treatment with LTRA was the least preferred. No apparent differences were found for asthma control.ConclusionsUncontrolled children/adolescents on low-dose ICS should be recommended a change to medium-dose ICS+LABA to reduce the risk for exacerbation and improve lung function.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment Programme

Publisher

European Respiratory Society (ERS)

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Reference71 articles.

1. World Health Organization . Asthma. 2023. www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/asthma Date last accessed: 3 November 2023 .

2. The epidemiology, healthcare and societal burden and costs of asthma in the UK and its member nations: analyses of standalone and linked national databases

3. Asthma UK . Media. 2020. www.asthma.org.uk/about/media/facts-and-statistics Date last accessed: 29 February 2020 .

4. NHS England . Childhood asthma. 2020. www.england.nhs.uk/childhood-asthma Date last accessed: 29 February 2020 .

5. British Thoracic Society . BTS/SIGN British guideline for the management of asthma. 2019. www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/quality-improvement/guidelines/asthma Date last accessed: 3 November 2023 .

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3