ERS Statement: A core outcome set for clinical trials evaluating the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations
-
Published:2021-10-14
Issue:
Volume:
Page:2102006
-
ISSN:0903-1936
-
Container-title:European Respiratory Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur Respir J
Author:
Mathioudakis Alexander G.ORCID, Abroug Fekri, Agusti Alvar, Ananth Sachin, Bakke Per, Bartziokas KonstantinosORCID, Beghe Bianca, Bikov Andras, Bradbury Thomas, Brusselle GuyORCID, Cadus Cordula, Coleman Courtney, Contoli Marco, Corlateanu AlexandruORCID, Corlateanu Olga, Criner Gerard J., Csoma BalazsORCID, Emelyanov AlexanderORCID, Faner Rosa, Fernandez Romero Gustavo, Hammouda Zeineb, Horváth Peter, Huerta Garcia Arturo, Jacobs Michael, Jenkins ChristineORCID, Joos GuyORCID, Kharevich Olga, Kostikas KonstantinosORCID, Lapteva Elena, Lazar ZsofiaORCID, Leuppi Joerg D., Liddle Carol, Linnell John, López-Giraldo Alejandra, McDonald Vanessa M., Nielsen Rune, Papi AlbertoORCID, Saraiva Isabel, Sergeeva Galina, Sioutkou Agni, Sivapalan Pradeesh, Stovold Elizabeth, Wang Hao, Wen Fuqiang, Yorke Janelle, Williamson Paula R., Vestbo Jørgen, Jensen Jens-UlrikORCID
Abstract
Clinical trials evaluating the management of acute exacerbations of COPD assess heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those that are clinically relevant or more important to patients. We have developed a core outcome set, a consensus-based minimum set of important outcomes that we recommend are evaluated in all future clinical trials on exacerbations management, to improve their quality and comparability. COPD exacerbations outcomes were identified through methodological systematic reviews and qualitative interviews with 86 patients from 11 countries globally. The most critical outcomes were prioritized for inclusion in the core outcome set through a two-round Delphi survey that was completed by 1,063 participants (256 patients, 488 health professionals and 319 clinical academics) from 88 countries in 5 continents. Two global, multi-stakeholder, virtual consensus meetings were conducted to (i) finalize the core outcome set and (ii) prioritize a single measurement instrument to be used for evaluating each of the prioritized outcomes. Consensus was informed by rigorous methodological systematic reviews. The views of patients with COPD were accounted for in all stages of the project. Survival, treatment success, breathlessness, quality of life, activities of daily living, need for higher level of care, arterial blood gases, disease progression, future exacerbations and hospital admissions, treatment safety and adherence were all included in the core outcome set. Focused methodological research was recommended to further validate and optimize some of the selected measurement instruments. The panel did not consider the prioritized set of outcomes and associated measurement instruments burdensome for patients and health professionals to use.
Funder
European Respiratory Society National Institute for Health Research Medical Research Council
Publisher
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
Subject
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|