ERS Statement: A core outcome set for clinical trials evaluating the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations

Author:

Mathioudakis Alexander G.ORCID,Abroug Fekri,Agusti Alvar,Ananth Sachin,Bakke Per,Bartziokas KonstantinosORCID,Beghe Bianca,Bikov Andras,Bradbury Thomas,Brusselle GuyORCID,Cadus Cordula,Coleman Courtney,Contoli Marco,Corlateanu AlexandruORCID,Corlateanu Olga,Criner Gerard J.,Csoma BalazsORCID,Emelyanov AlexanderORCID,Faner Rosa,Fernandez Romero Gustavo,Hammouda Zeineb,Horváth Peter,Huerta Garcia Arturo,Jacobs Michael,Jenkins ChristineORCID,Joos GuyORCID,Kharevich Olga,Kostikas KonstantinosORCID,Lapteva Elena,Lazar ZsofiaORCID,Leuppi Joerg D.,Liddle Carol,Linnell John,López-Giraldo Alejandra,McDonald Vanessa M.,Nielsen Rune,Papi AlbertoORCID,Saraiva Isabel,Sergeeva Galina,Sioutkou Agni,Sivapalan Pradeesh,Stovold Elizabeth,Wang Hao,Wen Fuqiang,Yorke Janelle,Williamson Paula R.,Vestbo Jørgen,Jensen Jens-UlrikORCID

Abstract

Clinical trials evaluating the management of acute exacerbations of COPD assess heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those that are clinically relevant or more important to patients. We have developed a core outcome set, a consensus-based minimum set of important outcomes that we recommend are evaluated in all future clinical trials on exacerbations management, to improve their quality and comparability. COPD exacerbations outcomes were identified through methodological systematic reviews and qualitative interviews with 86 patients from 11 countries globally. The most critical outcomes were prioritized for inclusion in the core outcome set through a two-round Delphi survey that was completed by 1,063 participants (256 patients, 488 health professionals and 319 clinical academics) from 88 countries in 5 continents. Two global, multi-stakeholder, virtual consensus meetings were conducted to (i) finalize the core outcome set and (ii) prioritize a single measurement instrument to be used for evaluating each of the prioritized outcomes. Consensus was informed by rigorous methodological systematic reviews. The views of patients with COPD were accounted for in all stages of the project. Survival, treatment success, breathlessness, quality of life, activities of daily living, need for higher level of care, arterial blood gases, disease progression, future exacerbations and hospital admissions, treatment safety and adherence were all included in the core outcome set. Focused methodological research was recommended to further validate and optimize some of the selected measurement instruments. The panel did not consider the prioritized set of outcomes and associated measurement instruments burdensome for patients and health professionals to use.

Funder

European Respiratory Society

National Institute for Health Research

Medical Research Council

Publisher

European Respiratory Society (ERS)

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3