Methods for biogeochemical studies of sea ice: The state of the art, caveats, and recommendations

Author:

Miller Lisa A.1,Fripiat Francois23,Else Brent G.T.45,Bowman Jeff S.6,Brown Kristina A.7,Collins R. Eric8,Ewert Marcela6,Fransson Agneta9,Gosselin Michel10,Lannuzel Delphine11,Meiners Klaus M.1213,Michel Christine14,Nishioka Jun15,Nomura Daiki15,Papadimitriou Stathys16,Russell Lynn M.17,Sørensen Lise Lotte1819,Thomas David N.161920,Tison Jean-Louis2,van Leeuwe Maria A.21,Vancoppenolle Martin22,Wolff Eric W.23,Zhou Jiayun224

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada

2. Laboratoire de Glaciologie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

3. Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry, Earth Sciences Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

4. Department of Geography, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

5. Centre for Earth Observation Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

6. School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States

7. Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

8. School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States

9. Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway

10. Institut des sciences de la mer, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, Quebec, Canada

11. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, IMAS–Sandy Bay, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

12. Australian Antarctic Division, Dept. of the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia

13. Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

14. Freshwater Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

15. Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

16. School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, United Kingdom

17. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California, United States

18. Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark

19. Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

20. Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland

21. Laboratory of Plant Physiology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

22. Laboratoire d’Océanographie et du Climat (LOCEAN-IPSL), Sorbonne Universités (UPMC Paris 6, CNRS, IRD, MNHN), Paris, France

23. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

24. Unité d’océanographie chimique, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract Over the past two decades, with recognition that the ocean’s sea-ice cover is neither insensitive to climate change nor a barrier to light and matter, research in sea-ice biogeochemistry has accelerated significantly, bringing together a multi-disciplinary community from a variety of fields. This disciplinary diversity has contributed a wide range of methodological techniques and approaches to sea-ice studies, complicating comparisons of the results and the development of conceptual and numerical models to describe the important biogeochemical processes occurring in sea ice. Almost all chemical elements, compounds, and biogeochemical processes relevant to Earth system science are measured in sea ice, with published methods available for determining biomass, pigments, net community production, primary production, bacterial activity, macronutrients, numerous natural and anthropogenic organic compounds, trace elements, reactive and inert gases, sulfur species, the carbon dioxide system parameters, stable isotopes, and water-ice-atmosphere fluxes of gases, liquids, and solids. For most of these measurements, multiple sampling and processing techniques are available, but to date there has been little intercomparison or intercalibration between methods. In addition, researchers collect different types of ancillary data and document their samples differently, further confounding comparisons between studies. These problems are compounded by the heterogeneity of sea ice, in which even adjacent cores can have dramatically different biogeochemical compositions. We recommend that, in future investigations, researchers design their programs based on nested sampling patterns, collect a core suite of ancillary measurements, and employ a standard approach for sample identification and documentation. In addition, intercalibration exercises are most critically needed for measurements of biomass, primary production, nutrients, dissolved and particulate organic matter (including exopolymers), the CO2 system, air-ice gas fluxes, and aerosol production. We also encourage the development of in situ probes robust enough for long-term deployment in sea ice, particularly for biological parameters, the CO2 system, and other gases.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Ecology,Environmental Engineering,Oceanography

Reference411 articles.

Cited by 81 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3