Assessment of the balance of the competence formation process: analysis of the curricula of Russian universities

Author:

Sokolova Tatiana N., ,Gusyatnikov Victor N.,Bezrukov Aleksey I.,Kayukova Inna V., , ,

Abstract

Introduction. Curricula are the main tool for organizing the educational process in Russian universities. The quality of education and the possible level of formation of the graduate's competencies directly depend on their validity and balance. Going on a competence model of education demanded change in the principles of drawing up of curricula. However, until now, the quality of curricula is assessed according to formal criteria that are weakly related to the competence-based approach. Also, answers to simple questions have not been formulated: how many disciplines can and should form one competence, how many competencies can be formed within one discipline and within one semester, how the presence of gaps in the process of forming competencies affects the final level of their formation. The aim of the work is to propose quantitative characteristics for assessing the balance and consistency of the process of forming competencies based on a statistical analysis of the current curricula of Russian universities. Materials and methods. As a material for the study, curricula were chosen in the specialty "Applied Informatics" of federal state budgetary and autonomous educational organizations (45 institutes and universities in total). Methods of mathematical and statistical analysis were applied: frequency analysis, methods for comparing means, analysis of standard deviations. Research results. On average, each competency forms from 2 to 8 disciplines. The largest number of disciplines in most curricula forms 1, 2 or 3 competencies. There are relatively few disciplines that form more than 4 competencies in the curricula of most universities. It is shown that the lack of continuity and development, the presence of gaps in the process of forming competence can reduce the achieved level of competence to 30% of the possible due to forgetting. The discussion of the results. The presence of deviations from the average indicators may in some cases indicate an insufficient balance of curricula. In the future, it is possible to embed the proposed methodology into an intelligent system for assessing the characteristics of the educational process within the framework of the university's QMS.

Publisher

Scientific and Educational Initiative

Subject

Philosophy,Education

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3