An Investigation of the Relationship Between in Vitro and in Vivo Ultrasound Image Quality Parameters

Author:

Browne Jacinta E,Watson Amanada J,Muir Cathy,Hoskins Peter R,Elliott Alex T

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the relationship between B-mode and colour Doppler technical test methods with the clinical perception of B-mode and Doppler in vivo test parameters. It was found that technical and clinical comparisons between the B-mode test parameters — lateral resolution versus clinical resolution, anechoic target detection versus clinical noise and penetration depth versus clinically useful penetration depth — demonstrated moderate correlations ( r = –0.69, p < 0.003; r = 0.5, p = 0.14; and r = 0.56, p < 0.03, respectively). However, axial resolution versus tissue texture variation, slice thickness versus overall clinical image quality and contrast resolution versus clinically useful dynamic range demonstrated poor correlations. The majority of the colour Doppler performance parameters were found to demonstrate moderate correlations: sensitivity performance index and clinical Doppler sensitivity ( r = 0.52, p < 0.07); axial/lateral resolution and clinical colour Doppler resolution ( r = –0.64, p = 0.02/–0.55, p = 0.05); and temporal resolution and clinical temporal resolution ( r = –0.59, although not statistically significant p = 0.4). The poor correlations for axial resolution slice thickness and contrast resolution suggest that some revision of the test protocols may be required or that these quantities are not as important as previously thought in image quality. Whereas, the test protocols for anechoic target detection, penetration depth and, in particular, lateral resolution appear promising in their prediction of clinical perception of image quality. The newly developed colour Doppler test protocols and test objects also appear promising in their prediction of clinical perception and merit further investigation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3