Publisher
JSC National Scientific Medical Research Center
Reference10 articles.
1. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Kratzik C, Marberger MJ. Comparison of open versus laporoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. European Urology 44, 2003, 340-345. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00297-5.
2. O’Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, Jones M, Pickup C, Atkinson C, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2001; 87: 287–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.00108.x.
3. Jacobs BL, Lai JC, Seelam R2, Hanley JM, Wolf JS Jr, Hollenbeck BK, Hollingsworth JM, Dick AW, Setodji CM, Saigal CS. The Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. Urology. 2018 Jan; 111: 72-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.002
4. Anderson JK, Kabalin JN, Cadeddu JA. Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneum, adrenals, kidneys, and ureters. İn Campbell’s Urology: 33-96, 2008
5. Kogan BA. Disorders of the ureter and ureteropelvic junction. In Smith´s General Urology, Edited by Tanagho FA, McAninch JW. XVII edition. 2012, 559-573 DOI:10/1036/0071457372