The Quality of Medical Consultations in a Teaching Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Babaniamansour Sepideh

Abstract

Background and objectives: Medical consultations became undeniable elements for the quality of health care and training of medical residence. This study aimed to assess the quality of performed consultations. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study at Shohadaye Tajrish hospital, affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, in Tehran, Iran between 20th April 2018 and 4th May 2019. The reported items and quality score of medical consultation requests and responses between emergency and non-emergency consultations and between the faculty members and medical residents were assessed by SPSS version 21.0. Results: Among 431 medical consultations, most were non-emergency, requested by residents, and responded to by faculty members. The quality of consultations requested (p < 0.001) or responded (p < 0.001) by faculty members was higher than by medical residents. Higher year residents performed higher quality consultation requests (p = 0.008) and responses (p < 0.001). The quality score of consultation requests (p = 0.51) and responses (p = 0.1) had no significant difference between types of consultation. Conclusion: Underreported items of consultation impressed its quality. Faculty members and higher-year residents performed higher quality consultations.

Publisher

SciRes Literature LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Al Wadaani HA, Hassan Balaha M. Evaluation of medical consultation letters at King Fahd Hospital, Al Hufuf, Saudi Arabia. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;12:54. Epub 2012 Jun 29. PMID: 22937194; PMCID: PMC3428174.

2. Bridges DR, Davidson RA, Odegard PS, Maki IV, Tomkowiak J. Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education. Med Educ Online. 2011 Apr 8;16. doi: 10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035. PMID: 21519399; PMCID: PMC3081249.

3. Couper ID, Henbest RJ. The quality and relationship of referral and reply letters. The effect of introducing a pro forma letter. S Afr Med J. 1996 Dec;86(12):1540-2. PMID: 8998223.

4. Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):831-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.8.831. PMID: 17327525.

5. Babaniamansour P, Mohammadi M, Babaniamansour S, Aliniagerdroudbari E. The Relation between Atherosclerosis Plaque Composition and Plaque Rupture. J Med Signals Sens. 2020 Nov 11;10(4):267-273. doi: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_48_19. PMID: 33575199; PMCID: PMC7866947.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3