Advantages of Interactive Visualization Tools in Planning Tasks-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Advantages of Interactive Visualization Tools in Planning Tasks

Published:2019-11-11 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:GraphiCon'2019 Proceedings. Volume 2
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Захарова Алёна¹,Zaharova Alena²,Вехтер Евгения³,Vehter Evgeniya⁴,Шкляр Алексей⁵,Shklyar Aleksey⁶

Affiliation:

1. Брянский государственный технический университет

2. Bryansk State Technical University

3. Томский политехнический университет

4. Tomskiy politehnicheskiy universitet

5. Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет

6. Nacional'nyy issledovatel'skiy Tomskiy politehnicheskiy universitet

Abstract

The paper proposes the use of visualization tools as an independent or complementary tool designed to solve problems related to the planning and audit of the results of various processes. The advantages arising as a result of transition to attraction of visual perception for formation of the General idea of process and its results existing in the form of heterogeneous data are shown. The use of visualization tools to find contradictions and errors made at the stage of process design is proposed. The proposed tool for visualizing an educational environment is supplemented by an ability to save options for solving planning problems and for corresponding real results. This creates conditions for a planning search for periods of varying lengths, during which the search and evaluation of factors that have necessary effect on the achieved results of the educational program are carried out.

Publisher

Bryansk State Technical University

Reference13 articles.

1. Batch A., Elmqvist N. The Interactive Visualization Gap inInitial Exploratory Data Analysis. // IEEE Transactions onVisualization and Computer Graphics, 2018, Vol. 24, Issue1, pp. 278-287. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2743990, Batch A., Elmqvist N. The Interactive Visualization Gap inInitial Exploratory Data Analysis. // IEEE Transactions onVisualization and Computer Graphics, 2018, Vol. 24, Issue1, pp. 278-287. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2743990

2. Blascheck T. [et al.]. VA2: A Visual Analytics Approachfor Evaluating Visual Analytics Applications // IEEETransactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics,2016, Vol. 22, Issue 1, pp. 61-70. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467871, Blascheck T. [et al.]. VA2: A Visual Analytics Approachfor Evaluating Visual Analytics Applications // IEEETransactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics,2016, Vol. 22, Issue 1, pp. 61-70. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467871

3. Cano S. [et al.]. A Visualization and Human-ComputerInteraction Proposal in the Context of PronunciationInformation // IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologiasdel Aprendizaje, 2016, Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 12-17. doi:10.1109/RITA.2016.2518440, Cano S. [et al.]. A Visualization and Human-ComputerInteraction Proposal in the Context of PronunciationInformation // IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologiasdel Aprendizaje, 2016, Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 12-17. doi:10.1109/RITA.2016.2518440

4. Chen C. Top 10 Unsolved Information VisualizationProblems // IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,2005, Vol. 25 Issue 4, pp. 12–16. doi:10.1109/MCG.2005.91, Chen C. Top 10 Unsolved Information VisualizationProblems // IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,2005, Vol. 25 Issue 4, pp. 12–16. doi:10.1109/MCG.2005.91

5. Chen M., Golan A. What May Visualization ProcessesOptimize? // IEEE Transactions on Visualization andComputer Graphics. 2016, Vol. 22, Issue 12, pp. 2619–2632. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2015.2513410, Chen M., Golan A. What May Visualization ProcessesOptimize? // IEEE Transactions on Visualization andComputer Graphics. 2016, Vol. 22, Issue 12, pp. 2619–2632. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2015.2513410