Affiliation:
1. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai Institute of International Organizations and Global Governance,Shanghai,China,
2. Fudan University,Faculty of Law,Shanghai,,China,
Abstract
Globalization and international trade call for dispute resolution service
competitions among various nations. China is building a Diversified Dispute
Resolution Mechanism (DDRM) to connect litigation with alternative dispute
resolution methods to enhance the efficiency and flexibility of its dispute resolution
system and improve the legal environment for foreign investment. This Chapter
demonstrates China’s latest development in international commercial dispute resolution
from three perspectives: the construction of the Chinese International Commercial
Court under the Belt-and-Road Initiative, arbitration reforms in FTZs, and the
development of commercial mediation in China with the impact of the Singapore
Mediation Convention on Mediation. These judicial reforms and legal practices prove
that China is moving towards the modernization of its commercial dispute resolution
system, but further legislative and judicial reforms are required.
Structure: The structure of this chapter consists of five sections. Section I summarizes
the concept of a diversified dispute resolution mechanism (DDSM) in the background
of China’s further integration into the world market and embracing international rules
of commercial dispute resolution. Section II to IV demonstrates the framework of the
DDSM from three perspectives: international commercial court, arbitration, and
commercial mediation. Section II focuses on China’s International Commercial Court
with emphasis on its jurisdiction, expertise in foreign law ascertainment, procedural
reforms, and the construction of a one-stop international commercial dispute resolution
platform. Section III concentrates on international arbitration reforms in the context of
free trade zones. The FTZs serve as a judicial experiment for allowing foreign
arbitration institutions to administer international commercial disputes in China, with
practical challenges, such as the legality concern of foreign arbitration institutions, the
scope of foreign-related disputes, and judicial support for the arbitration proceedings
administered by foreign arbitration institutions. Section IV discusses the mediation
legal framework in China, focusing on judicial mediation and commercial mediation,
with a light touch on the impact of the Singapore Convention on China’s mediation development. Section V concludes with current challenges to China’s development in a
diversified dispute resolution mechanism and provides recommendations for the future
development of the DDRM.<br>
Publisher
BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS
Reference19 articles.
1. Belohlavek A.J.; Seat of arbitration and supporting and supervising function of courts. 2015,21-48
2. Cappelletti M.; The judicial process in comparative perspective 1989
3. Chaisse J.; Qian X.; Conservative Innovation: The Ambiguities of the China International Commercial Court. American Journal of International Law 2021,115,17-21
4. Clarke D.C.; Dispute resolution in China. J Chinese L 1991,5,245
5. de la Rasilla I.; ‘Sharp Ears to Hear a Thunderclap’? The rise of mediation in the international dispute prevention and settlement system of the belt and road initiative. Asia Pacific Law Review 2021,29(1),167-188