Author:
George Anil,Movahed Assad
Abstract
Most incident coronary disease occurs in previously asymptomatic individuals who were considered to be at a lower risk by traditional screening methods. There is a definite advantage if these individuals could be reclassified into a higher risk category, thereby impacting disease outcomes favorably. Coronary artery calcium scores have been recognized as an independent marker for adverse prognosis in coronary disease. Multiple population based studies have acknowledged the shortcomings of risk prediction models such as the Framingham risk score or the Procam score. The science behind coronary calcium is discussed briefly followed by a review of current thinking on calcium scores. An attempt has been made to summarize the appropriate indications and use of calcium scores.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference55 articles.
1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K.
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2008 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee
Circulation
2008;
117
: 25-146.
2. Robert N, Anderson PD, Betty L, Smith BS, Eds.
Deaths: Leading Causes for 2002
Available from http: //www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr53/nvsr53_17.pdf
2007
[cited 53 04/03/2008];
03/07/2005
3. Litchfield RL.
Noninvasive tests for cardiac risk stratification Which ones are most prognostic?
Postgrad Med
2004;
115
: 30-6.
4. Wilson PWF, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB.
Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories
Circulation
1998;
97
: 1837-47.
5. Michos ED, Nasir K, Braunstein JB, et al.
Framingham risk equation underestimates subclinical atherosclerosis risk in asymptomatic women
Atherosclerosis
2006;
184
: 201-6.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献