Author:
Musekene Emma,Modjadji Perpetua,Madiba Sphiwe
Abstract
Background:Needle stick and sharp injuries are a global public health issue, mainly due to exposure to infectious diseases. Dental students, in particular, are at a high risk of needle stick and sharp injuries attributed to the restricted working space of the oral cavity and the routine use of sharp instruments, among other risks. Despite this growing body of knowledge on needle stick and sharp injuries in the dental setting, data is limited among dental students in South Africa.Objective:The study aimed to determine the occurrence and contributing factors of needle stick and sharp injuries among dental undergraduate students in a university in South Africa.Methods:A university based cross-sectional study was conducted among 248 dental students in the School of Oral Health Sciences using a census sampling. An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on prevalence, procedures, instruments, reporting, contributing factors, training, protective strategies, and hepatitis B immunization. Data was analysed using STATA 14.Results:The response rate was 99% and the mean age of students was 24 years (SD=±4). Male students were 43% (107), while females constituted 57% (141) of the sample. One-hundred and one (41%) students reported being exposed to needle stick and sharps injuries. Most injuries (45%) occurred among students studying Bachelor of Dental and Surgery and among students in the 4thyear (57%). The people at the departments of periodontology (39%), and maxillofacial and oral Surgery (25%) experienced most injuries. The main tools causing injuries were the syringe needle (52%) and the scaler (31%) while injecting a patient (34%), and scaling and polishing (26%) were common procedures. Eight (8%) students did not report their injury, even though the use of prophylaxis exposure was minimal (8%). Very few students (5%) were tested for a blood-borne virus after injury, while 23% did nothing with their injury and 43% opted to wash the injury under tap water. Lack of concentration (36%) and anxiety (19%) were reported as major contributing factors to injuries. Two hundred and forty six (99%) students were fully vaccinated against hepatitis B. Two hundred and nineteen (86%) students were aware of full details on the use of universal precautions. One hundred and eighty six (75%) students practiced needle recapping. Being in the 3rdyear (AOR = 3.0, 95%CI: 1.4 - 6.3), 4thyear (AOR = 5.0, 95%CI: 1.9 – 11) and 5thyear (AOR=4.6, 95%CI: 2 -12.5) was significantly associated to injuries compared to students in the 2ndyear of the study.Conclusion:The needle stick and sharp injuries were prevalent in this study, and factors implicated were lack of concentration and anxiety, as well as, age, academic year of study and training on handling of instruments. The burden of needle stick and sharps injuries among the dental professionals can be reduced by adhering to the current and universally accepted standard precautionary measures against needle stick and sharp injuries.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Community and Home Care,Health (social science)
Reference46 articles.
1. AlDakhil L, Yenugadhati N, Al-Seraihi O, Al-Zoughool M. Prevalence and associated factors for needlestick and sharp injuries (NSIs) among dental assistants in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Environ Health Prev Med 2019; 24 (1) : 60.
2. Gaballah K, Warbuton D, Sihmbly K, Renton T. Needle stick injuries among dental students: risk factors and recommendations for prevention. Libyan J Med 2012; 7 (1) : 17507.
3. Moodley I, Naidoo S. Percutaneous Exposure Incidents-prevalence, knowledge and perceptions of dental personnel and students at a dental training site in KwaZulu-Natal. South African Dental Journal 2015; 70 (8) : 334-9.
4. Mast EE. Alter MJ. Prevention of hepatitis B virus infectionamong health care workers. Hepatitis BVaccines in Clinical Practice 1993.
5. Chandrasekhar H, Kumar MPS. Needlestick injuries in dentistry - A review. Drug Invention Today 2018; 10 : 692-6.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献