Is it Heuristics in Use or ‘Ritualistic and Instrumentalist’ in Purpose? Neoliberal Philosophy and the Use of KAPS (Knowledge, Attitude and Practise Surveys) in a Least Developed Nation
-
Published:2018-06-12
Issue:1
Volume:11
Page:243-274
-
ISSN:1874-9445
-
Container-title:The Open Public Health Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:TOPHJ
Author:
Chakravartty Avaniendra
Abstract
Background:Isms affect the way we think, define, approach and seek to understand and solve any particular issue or condition. The particular ism that prevails currently has been labeled as neoliberalism. Here the ways that researchers use KAPS for various health issues or conditions and the extent to which it is connected to the existing reality along with its pragmatic utility are assessed. Based on how heuristics is conceptualized the use of KAPs is heuristics in use. The primary task of this article embarks is on determining whether the researches using KAPS has any heuristic purpose or is it just fulfilling some self- centered ritualistic and instrumentalist objective. The focus here is on Nepal but that does not mean that the arguments made here is not applicable to other nations that have similar socio-economic conditions.Methods/ Findings:The data selected here are researches done by an epistemic community presented in two national conferences. The methodology followed is based on dialectical reflexivity and the approach adopted is auto-ethnographic. The dominance of procrustean, atomistic, dehistoricized, reductionist and individualist philosophy that deemphasizes structural relations is seen. The incorporation of neoliberal values has created a trend where researches seem to solely serve ritualistic and instrumentalist purpose.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Community and Home Care,Health(social science)
Reference219 articles.
1. Adam RJ. Conceptualising the epistemic dimension of academic identity in an age of neo-liberalism. Educ Res Perspect 2012; 39 : 70-89.
2. Lave R. Neoliberalism and the production of environmental knowledge. Environ Soc 2012; 3 : 19-38.
3. Teo T. Sciences of the living dead: Race, psychology, and epistemic pollution Doing Psychology under New Conditions 2013; 122-30.
4. Belfiore E. On bullshit in cultural policy practice and research: Notes from the British case. Int J Cult Policy 2009; 15 : 343-59.
5. Lam SY. What kind of assumptions need to be realistic and how to test them: A response to tsang (2006). Strateg Manage J 2010; 31 : 679-87.