Author:
Adekiya Aruna Olasekan,Oloruntoba Adedeji,Ewulo Babatunde Sunday,Ogunbode Timothy,Sangoyomi Titilayo
Abstract
Background
The discovery of extensive gold deposits has raised concerns about potential heavy metal contamination in waterways and adjacent soils, particularly in developing nations like Nigeria where environmental regulations may not be stringent enough.
Objective
A research study was conducted to assess the levels of heavy metals in surface soils (0 to 25 cm deep) across 30 sites within three selected areas (Epe, Igun, and Ijana) located in the gold mining region of Ilesha, Osun State Nigeria.
Methods
The study employed an atomic absorption spectrophotometer to measure the total concentrations of heavy metals, specifically arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn). Furthermore, the research encompassed an examination of various physicochemical properties of the soil samples, including organic matter content, pH levels, organic carbon content, calcium content, phosphorus levels, cation exchange capacity, and particle size distribution.
Results
Results showed a range mean concentration with standard deviation of As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn of 1.0 – 7.1 ± 1.77 mg kg-1, 0.9 – 4.2 ± 0.84 mg kg-1, 1.0 – 6.0 ± 1.29 mg kg-1, 1.1 – 6.4 ± 1.57 mg kg-1, 2.90 – 20.9± 4.00 mg kg-1, 1.1 – 6.4 ±1.56 mg kg-1, 0.7 – 6.7 ±1.26 mg kg-1 and 11.7 – 70.7± 17.75 mg kg-1, respectively. The investigation of soils in three specific locations revealed significant contamination by heavy metals. However, it is worth noting that the concentrations of these metals fell below the established intervention levels outlined by environmental protection agencies such as the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization. The distribution of heavy metals and their availability exhibited a direct correlation with the distance from the mining sites, spanning from 0 to 900 meters. Two critical factors influencing the concentration of heavy metals in these areas were identified as soil particle size, specifically the clay percentage, and pH levels.
Conclusion
Despite the presence of heavy metal pollution in the soils of Epe, Igun, and Ijana, they managed to maintain metal levels below the intervention thresholds set by environmental protection agencies, with the exception of cadmium (Cd).
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference29 articles.
1. Pen Z, Mico S, Hasan O.
Background in soils a linear process domain? An example from Istria (Croatia).
Environ Earth Sci
2009;
59
(6)
: 1367-83.
2. Adekiya AO, Oloruntoba AP, Ojeniyi SO, Ewulo BS.
Heavy metal composition of maize and tomato grown on contaminated soils.
Open Agric
2018;
3
(1)
: 414-26.
3. Bashir I, Lone FA, Bhat RA, Mir SA, Dar ZA, Dar SA.
Concerns and threats of contamination on aquatic ecosystems.
Bioremediation and Biotechnology
2020;
27
: 1-26.
4. Wuana RA, Okieimen FE.
Heavy metals in contaminated soils: A review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation.
ISRN Ecol
2011;
2011
: 1-20.
5. Briffa J, Sinagra E, Blundell R.
Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans.
Heliyon
2020;
6
(9)
: e04691.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献