Psychotropic Medication Use among Traumatized Individuals with and without Psychiatric Histories

Author:

King Alan R.1ORCID,Kuhn Sara K.1ORCID,Brezinski Stephanie1ORCID,Jowkar Michael1ORCID,Smith Kourtney1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, ND, United States

Abstract

Background: Prescription rates for major classes of psychotropic medication were examined among respondents with and without histories of trauma and PTSD. While traumatized patients access primary health care at higher rates than normative counterparts, the extent to which they rely on psychiatric medications has not been well established. Methods: This study surveyed college (N=2,320) and national (N=663) respondents. Trauma history was defined using the primary DSM-5 diagnostic criterion for Post- Traumatic Stress Disorder. Four hypotheses were tested: 1) medication reliance was expected to occur more frequently among respondents reporting a trauma history and PTSD than normative counterparts; 2) medication reliance was expected to occur more frequently among respondents reporting a trauma history without PTSD than normative (no trauma) counterparts; 3) gender differences in these associations between trauma exposure and medication history were not expected; 4) associations between trauma exposure and medication history were expected to be similar for college and national respondents. Results: Support was found for these four hypotheses. Significant associations between self-reported trauma and reliance on psychotropic medications remained even after control of variance associated with gender, sample composition, and PTSD diagnosis. Recollections of a traumatic event as defined by the DSM-V criteria for PTSD increased the odds of being prescribed five different classes of psychiatric medication. Conclusion: Trauma exposure both with and without co-occurring mental health conditions was associated with higher reliance on psychotrophic medications. The clinical implications of these patterns remain unclearly delineated. The cross-sectional correlation analyses relied upon in this study precluded meaningful onferences regarding the causality and/or directionality of these relationships.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Psychiatry and Mental health,Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3