Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) Treatment for Hospitalized Patients with COVID- 19

Author:

Tsanovska Hristina1,Simova Iana123,Genov Vladislav1,Kundurzhiev Todor4,Krasnaliev Jordan1,Kornovski Vladimir5,Dimitrov Nikolai135,Vekov Toni23

Affiliation:

1. Heart and Brain, Center of Excellence, University Hospital, Pleven, Bulgaria

2. Bulgarian Cardiac Institute, Bulgaria

3. Medical University, Pleven, Bulgaria

4. Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria

5. Heart and Brain Hospital, Burgas, Bulgaria

Abstract

Objective: Studies have indicated that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) exerts antiviral effects against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. However, trials regarding its effects on patients are very controversial. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of (HCQ) in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 260 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in Heart and Brain Center of Excellence- Pleven, Bulgaria, for the period from November 6 to December 28, 2020. This study is not randomized, which we compensated for with Propensity Score Matching. Patients in the HCQ group were given HCQ 200 mg 3 times a day (600mg daily) for the duration of their hospitalization plus conventional treatment, while those in the control group were given conventional treatment only. The primary endpoints were transferred to the intensive care unit, needed for mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital death. Results: Of the 260 COVID-19 patients, 178 (68.5%) were male and the mean age was of 63.78 ± 12.45 years, with the most prevalent comorbidity hypertension (68.5%). We had two subgroups: treated with HCQ and conventional treatment (128 patients) and treated with conventional treatment only (132 patients). In the primary analysis, patients in the HCQ group presented with fewer comorbidities and were younger than the group without HCQ. Patients treated with HCQ demonstrated a significant benefit in the primary endpoints compared to those without HCQ, namely, transferred to ICU – 20 (20,8%) vs. 41 (36.9%), p=0.011, need for mechanical ventilation 13 (13.4%) vs. 33 (28.2%), p=0.009 and in-hospital death 14 (10.9%) vs. 35 (26.5%), p=0,001, respectively. We repeated this analysis with PSM, where 70 matched pairs were identified. Regarding the primary endpoints, we found again a statistically significant difference between the groups. Comparing transferring to ICU, better outcomes were presented in the HCQ group: 8 (17.4%) vs. 27 (44.3%), with p= 0.003. Besides, a smaller proportion of the patients needed mechanical ventilation: 6 (12.8%), compared to the control group, 23 (35.4%), p= 0.007. Notably, patients from the HCQ group died during hospitalization: 8 (11.4%) in comparison with 19 (27.1%) from the control group, p= 0.018. Conclusion: Patients treated with HCQ demonstrated a significant benefit in the primary endpoints in our study, namely, transfer to the intensive care unit, need for mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital death. HCQ improves prognosis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Microbiology (medical),Pharmacology,Molecular Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3