Author:
Rokn Amir Reza,Labibzadeh Akram,Ghohroudi Amir Alireza Rasouli,Shamshiri Ahmad Reza,Solhjoo Somaye
Abstract
Introduction:
A correct diagnosis and optimal treatment planning is essential for success in implant dentistry. Proper diagnosis of bone quality is an important part of the diagnostic procedure.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to correlate the tactile sense of the surgeon in the assessment of bone density to the histomorphometric analysis of bone quality.
Methods:
In this study, 56 bone samples from 33 patients were harvested from implant sites with trephine drills. The samples were analyzed with Image J software. In the samples following parameters were measured: BV/TV, superficial cortical plate thickness, the number and thickness of haversian canals in cortical bone and the number, thickness and distance of trabecules in cancellous bone. The clinical hardness of bone during drilling was evaluated by surgeon according to Misch. GEE analysis with exchangeable correlation structure and linear model was used to evaluate the relationship between the tactile sense of the surgeon and histomorphometric parameters and all analysis was adjusted for two confounding variables: gender and location.
Results:
There were 51.79% implants in D2 samples and 48.21% in D3. Bone classification according to Misch was significantly correlated to distance of trabecules in cancellous bone (P-value=0.05), and shown marginally significant correlation with mean superficial cortical bone thickness (P-value =0.07) and number of haversian canals (P-value =0.005) in cortical bone.
Discussion:
There were differences between our results and others. The authors believed that these differences mainly are because of confounding factors, that in this study were eliminated. The clinical finding during surgery can approximately explain the histologic properties of bone.
Conclusion:
It is concluded that tactile sense of the surgeon can exhibit the histologic properties of the bone, and we are able to estimate the healing prognosis of the bone in implant placement.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference33 articles.
1. Rokn A, Rasouli G. AA, Daneshmonfared M, Menasheof R, Shamshiri AR.
Tactile sense of the surgeon in determining bone density when placing dental implant.
Implant Dent
2014;
23
(6)
: 697-703.
2. Fuh LJ, Huang HL, Chen CS, et al.
Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone.
J Oral Rehabil
2010;
37
(5)
: 346-51.
3. Jaffin RA, Berman CL.
The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis.
J Periodontol
1991;
62
(1)
: 2-4.
4. Linck GK, Ferreira GM, De Oliveira RC, Lindh C, Leles CR, Ribeiro-Rotta RF.
The influence of tactile perception on classification of bone tissue at dental implant insertion.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
2016;
18
(3)
: 601-8.
5. Pereira AC, Souza PP, Souza JA, Silva TA, Batista AC, Ribeiro-Rotta RF.
Histomorphometrical and molecular evaluation of endosseous dental implants sites in humans: Correlation with clinical and radiographic aspects.
Clin Oral Implants Res
2013;
24
(4)
: 414-21.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献