Author:
Arruda Marcela Monice,Toppino Marina Augusto,Barbosa Gabriela Monteiro,Costi Hilton Túlio,Silva Cecy Martins,Nogueira Araújo Jesuína Lamartine
Abstract
Background:
The pH of fluoride gels influences the roughness of composite resins, which affects their clinical durability.
Objective:
To evaluate the effect of fluoride gels (1.23% acidified phosphate fluoride and neutral fluoride) on the morphology of different composite resins after finishing and polishing.
Methods:
We prepared sixty specimens with a diameter of 5 mm and a height of 2 mm. The specimens were then divided into six groups (n = 10), according to the type of composite resin (Z250 micro-hybrid (Z), Filtek Z350 XT nanoparticles (XT), and Tetric N-Ceram nano-hybrid (TC)) and fluoride gel treatment (1.23% acidified phosphate (APF) or neutral fluoride (NF)) to measure surface roughness (Ra). The material was light-cured using an LED-curing unit (Elipar Freelight Deep Cure-3M/ESPE) for 20 s with a light intensity of 1.200 mW/cm2. Ra measurements were performed before and after treatment with different fluoride gels using a rugosimeter (Mitutoyo SJ210). After Ra, we selected two samples from each group for evaluation using scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA, and Tukey tests, with a significance of 5%.
Results:
The average Ra before and after NF did not differ statistically. The average Ra values of the groups treated with APF showed statistically significant differences. The photomicrographs of the groups treated with NF were similar to those of the groups without fluoride treatment. The APF-treated groups showed significant morphological changes.
Conclusion:
NF did not promote changes in the morphology of the evaluated composite resins, in contrast to APF, which caused significant changes.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference32 articles.
1. Janus J, Fauxpoint G, Arntz Y, Pelletier H, Etienne O.
Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach.
Dent Mater
2010;
26
(5)
: 416-25.
2. Nithya K, Sridevi K, Keerthi V, Ravishankar P.
Evaluation of surface roughness, hardness, and gloss of composites after three different finishing and polishing techniques: An In Vitro Study
Cureus
2020;
12
(2)
: e7037.
3. Nasoohi N, Hoorizad M, Tabatabaei SF.
Effects of wet and dry finishing and polishing on surface roughness and microhardness of composite resins.
J Dent (Tehran)
2017;
14
(2)
: 69-75.
4. Aytac F, Karaarslan ES, Agaccioglu M, Tastan E, Buldur M, Kuyucu E.
Effects of novel finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and morphology of nanocomposites.
J Esthet Restor Dent
2016;
28
(4)
: 247-61.
5. St-Pierre L, Martel C, Crépeau H, Vargas MA.
Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resins: Polishability of composite resins.
Oper Dent
2019;
44
(3)
: E122-32.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献