Author:
Kassim Zethy Hanum Mohamed,Faiz Anuar Muhamad Alif,Ramli Sujana,Ismail Ikmal Hisham,Angelis Nicola De
Abstract
Aim:
This study compares the colour stability of two zirconium silicate-filled indirect composite materials CM and its improved formulation CMD using an in vitro thermocycling stain challenge model with 2 immersion solutions. The rationale of the thermocycling stain challenge model is to replicate the intraoral conditions that the indirect composite materials may be exposed to during a clinical service, water or saliva absorption and cyclical exposure to staining food colourant at varying temperature extremes.
Materials and Methods:
Ten discs each from shade A1 subtypes of CM and CMD indirect composites (Dentine Body A1B, Incisal 58, and Translucent HVT) were subjected to a thermocycling stain challenge following final polishing, which consisted of static immersion in 37°C of distilled water, followed by 500 thermocycles in 5°C of tea and 55°C of soy sauce and finally a 10-minute cleaning using an ultrasonic device. L*, a* and b* colour coordinates were measured, and the mean colour difference expressed as Delta E (ΔE) at different time points of the experiment were calculated and compared.
Results:
CM and CMD indirect composites had a significant color difference at all experimental time points (F=37.818, p<0.001). ΔE for CM subtypes and CMD subtypes in descending order, respectively, were Translucent HVT>Incisal 58>Dentin Body A1B and Incisal 58>Translucent HVT>Dentin Body A1B.
Conclusion:
CMD indirect composite showed improved colour stability compared to CM indirect composite.
Clinical Significance:
Limiting the usage of translucent shades and polishing according to the manufacturer’s recommendation may improve the overall colour of prostheses made using indirect zirconium silicate-filled composite materials.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference32 articles.
1. Peutzfeldt A.
Indirect resin and ceramic systems.
Oper Dent
2001;
(S6):
153-76.
2. Nandini S.
Indirect resin composites.
J Conserv Dent
2010;
13
(4)
: 184-94.
3. Mainjot A.
Recent advances in composite CAD/CAM blocks.
Int J Esthet Dent
2016;
11
(2)
: 275-80.
4. Soanca A, Roman A, Moldovan M, Perhaita I, Tudoran LB, Rominu M.
Study on thermal behaviour, structure and filler morphology of some indirect composite resins.
Dig J Nanomater Biostruct
2012;
7
(3)
: 1071-81.
5. Mayinger F, Reymus M, Liebermann A, et al.
Impact of polymerization and storage on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of veneering resin composites.
Dent Mater J
2021;
40
(2)
: 487-97.