Author:
Melo Maria,Ata-Ali Fadi,Cobo Teresa,Diago José,Chofré-Lorente María Teresa,Bagán Leticia,Sanchez-Recio Cristina,Ata-Ali Javier
Abstract
Background:
Child Abuse (CA) is defined as any physical or psychological harm inflicted upon children. The most commonly affected anatomical region in these cases is the orofacial complex, thereby placing dentists in a dominant position for detecting CA. The statistical figures referred to CA are high, and many cases go unreported.
Objective:
To determine the level of knowledge, the aptitudes and capacity of dentists in reporting cases of CA; the barriers facing the reporting of cases; and the key clinical characteristics for the detection of CA.
Methodology:
A search was made of the PubMed (MEDLINE), ScienceDirect, LILACS and SciELO databases for articles published up until March 2019, involving analytical observational and descriptive studies relevant to the objectives of our study. All articles were independently reviewed by two authors.
Results:
Injuries caused by CA are largely located in the orofacial region – the most prevalent being caries, burns and fractures. The most frequently identified risk factor is behavioral alterations on the part of the parents or caregivers. The reviewed studies reflect a discrepancy between suspected and reported cases of CA.
Conclusion:
Although dentists are able to detect injuries, there is a great lack of knowledge about how to report cases of CA to the authorities. It is interesting to establish guidelines for the detection and reporting of suspicious cases. Improved training in forensic and legal dentistry is needed, together with the establishment of detection and reporting protocols. The clinical signs detected in the case of CA and neglect include untreated caries, poor oral hygiene, traumatisms, burns, lacerations and biting. The recognition of such signs and correct case history compilation are essential for the detection of CA.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference68 articles.
1. Greenbaum J, Dubowitz H, Lutzker JR, Johnson KD, Orn K, Kenniston J.
Practice guidelines: Challenges in the evaluation of child neglect
2008.
2. Dubowitz H, Pitts SC, Litrownik AJ, Cox CE, Runyan D, Black MM.
Defining child neglect based on child protective services data.
Child Abuse Negl
2005;
29
(5)
: 493-511.
3. Lau AS, Leeb RT, English D, et al.
What’s in a name? A comparison of methods for classifying predominant type of maltreatment.
Child Abuse Negl
2005;
29
(5)
: 533-51.
4. Higgins DJ, McCabe MP.
Multi-type maltreatment and the long-term adjustment of adults.
Child Abuse Rev
2000;
9
: 6-18.
5. Kaur H, Chaudhary S, Choudhary N, Manuja N, Chaitra TR, Amit SA.
Child abuse: Cross-sectional survey of general dentists.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res
2016;
6
(2)
: 118-23.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献