Author:
Alzahrani Abdullah A. H.,Alhassan Eltayeb M.,Attia Mahmoud A.,Albanghali Mohammad A.
Abstract
Background:A key role of dental carving is enhancing manual proficiency and dexterity of dental hygiene students. Yet, utilizing Supplementary Online Dental Anatomy Resources (SODAR) as a supportive teaching approach has demonstrated the ability to improve carving skills.Objective:This study aims to examine the effectiveness of SODAR training in improving the quality of dental carving skills and knowledge among preclinical Saudi male students in Saudi Arabia.Methods:A basic double-blinded randomized controlled trial of 30 preclinical Saudi dental male students was conducted between January and April 2019. Participants were classified into an experimental group that received SODAR training (n= 15) and a control group comprising students who did not receive SODAR training (n= 15). Thet-test and Fisher’s exact test were performed to assess differences in theoretical knowledge between the two groups. While Cohen’s d test,t-test, and Pearson correlation were conducted to evaluate differences in students’ dental carvings.Results:Students with SODAR training performed better on practical carving sessions than those without intervention (P-value < 0.001). However, SODAR intervention had no significant effect on the theoretical knowledge evaluations in both the groups.Conclusion:SODAR training demonstrated its ability to support students learning in practical carving sessions; however, no effect on theoretical knowledge was observed. Future research should focus on factors that impact carving teaching strategies, including the quality and depth of online learning content, students’ perceptions of online learning, and experiences of teachers who run the online resources.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference20 articles.
1. Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat 2016; 208 : 151-7.
2. Al-Asmar A, Nsour M, Alsoleihat F, Baqain Z. Is soap carving in dental anatomy predictive for clinical dental students’ performance in operative dentistry. J Dent Oral Biol 2017; 2 (5) : 1044-51.
3. Obrez A, Briggs C, Buckman J, Goldstein L, Lamb C, Knight WG. Teaching clinically relevant dental anatomy in the dental curriculum: description and assessment of an innovative module. J Dent Educ 2011; 75 (6) : 797-804.
4. Abu Eid R, Ewan K, Foley J, Oweis Y, Jayasinghe J. Self-directed study and carving tooth models for learning tooth morphology: perceptions of students at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland. J Dent Educ 2013; 77 (9) : 1147-53.
5. De Azevedo RdA, Da Rosa WL, Da Silva AF, et al. Comparative effectiveness of dental anatomy carving pedagogy: A systematic review. J Dent Educ 2015; 79 (8) : 914-21.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献