A Comparison of Liver MRI and Contrast-Enhanced CT as Standard Workup Before Treatment for Rectal Cancer in Usual Care - A Retrospective Study

Author:

Park Jennifer1ORCID,Block Mattias1ORCID,Bock David2ORCID,Kälebo Peter3ORCID,Nilsson Peter4ORCID,Prytz Mattias5ORCID,Haglind Eva1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Gothenburg, Sweden | Department of Surgery, Region VästraGötaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden

2. Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Gothenburg, Sweden

3. Department of Radiology, Region VästraGötaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden

4. Department of Radiology, Region VästraGötaland, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden

5. Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Gothenburg, Sweden | Department of Surgery, Region VästraGötaland, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden | Department of Research and Development, Region VästraGötaland, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden

Abstract

Background: The liver is the most common site for rectal cancer metastases. Recommended standard pre-treatment workups have involved Computed Tomography (CT) for abdominal metastases, however, few hospitals have replaced this with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare MRI with CT as an index examination of the liver in the pre-treatment workup in usual care. The primary endpoint was the need for supplementary liver investigations. Methods: Consecutive patients from two hospitals during 2013-2015 were identified in the Regional Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register and included in this retrospective study. Hospital records and radiology reports were reviewed. Inconclusive reports were re-evaluated by two radiologists. Result: A total of 320 patients were included, and 293 were available for analysis. Some 175 and 118 patients had undergone CT and MRI respectively, as their index pre-treatment liver examination. Thirty-four (19.4%) in the CT group and 6 (5.1%) patients in the MRI group underwent supplementary liver investigation due to inconclusive index examination (RR 3.82, 95% CI: 1.66; 8.81, p=0.0017). Median time (q1; q3) from index examination to start of treatment was 50 (36; 68) days in the CT group and 34 (27; 45) days in the MRI group. Conclusion: This retrospective study of two modalities within usual care found that MRI of the liver as index radiological workup before treatment for rectal cancer was associated with fewer supplementary liver investigations and a shorter time to start of treatment. Based on these findings, a prospective trial should be undertaken before implementing MRI as a standard. Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT03463616.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3