Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracies of USG, MG and MRI Modalities Defined with BI-RADS Classification System

Abstract

Background: BI-RADS classification provides facilitating information in diagnosis for radiologists. It allows radiologists to interpret mammograms accurately Objective: We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the modalities with the BI-RADS classification system made with imaging findings accompanied by USG, MG and MRI, which are a total of 3 modalities. Methods: This study included 82 patients who underwent Tru-Cut biopsy under the guidance of USG, MG, and MRI. Mammography, sonography and MRI were performed in the prone position. Results: Of the patients, 46.3%, 14.6%, and 39.0% were assessed in 4A, 4B, and 5 MRI BI-RADS categories, respectively. Based on the variable surgical/pathological diagnosis, 50%, 28.0%, and 22.0% of the patients were categorized as malignant findings, benign findings, and infection-inflammation-mastitis, respectively. The determination of the endpoints for the parameter of long-axis diameter (mm) was found to be statistically significant according to ROC analysis as a gold standard performed based on specificity levels of benign and malignant findings (p<0.05). A significant correlation was detected between the gold standard and the categorical variable MRI BI-RADS (χ^2=46.380, p<0.01). Conclusion: When specificity and sensitivity of all three modalities in surgical/pathological diagnosis were compared, it was concluded that MRI was superior to the other modalities, and a valuable method in prediction of lesion malignancy and determination of biopsy prediction and priority.