Comparing the Sensitivity and Specificity of Lung CT-scan with RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19

Author:

Ahmadpour Sajjad1ORCID,Vafaeimanesh Jamshid23ORCID,Asghari Akram2,Adeli Seyed-Hasan3ORCID,Parham Mahmoud2ORCID,Bagherzade Mohammad2ORCID,Shajari Rasoul2,Tabarrai Reihane2,Shakeri Masoumeh2,Habibi Mohammad Amin24,Jabbari Amir5,Jafari Saeede1,Razavinia Fatemesadat6ORCID,Foroghi Ghomi Seyed Yaser2,Ebrazeh Ali7

Affiliation:

1. Patient Safety Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

2. Clinical Research Development Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

3. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

4. Iranian Tissue Bank & Research Center, Gene, Cell & Tissue Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

5. Clinical Research Development Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran;

6. Student Research Committee, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

7. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

Abstract

Background: The lung is one of the major organs affected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Lung CT scan and RT-PCR are the most valuable diagnostic methods in the early diagnosis and management of COVID-19. Due to the possible inconsistency of the false-negative results for the RT-PCR test, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of lung CT-scan as an accurate diagnostic method of COVID-19. Method: In this cross-sectional study, patients suspected of COVID-19 and referred to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Qom city from February 26 to April 13, 2020, were enrolled. For a definitive diagnosis of COVID-19, chest CT scan and RT-PCR testing was performed for 644 patients, and both sensitivity and specificity of lung CT scan were evaluated. Results: According to the findings, and comparing to the RT-PCR test as the standard gold, sensitivity, specificity as well as, positive predictive and negative predictive values of lung CT-scan were found as follow; 94.47% (95% CI:90.73 - 97.02%), 24.71% (95% CI:20.70 - 29.07%), 40.73% (95% CI:36.58 - 44.99%), 89.08% (95% CI: 82.4 - 94.05%), respectively. Conclusion: According to the findings, the lung CT scan has a better diagnostic value than RT-PCR in symptomatic patients who were referred to the hospital for COVID-19 diagnosis. Performing lung CT-scan in patients with negative RT-PCR test should be assessed.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3