Abbreviated and Standard Breast MRI in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response Evaluation: A Comparative Study

Author:

Yirgin Inci Kizildag1ORCID,Engin Gulgun1ORCID,Yildiz Şeyma2ORCID,Aydin Esra Cureoglu3,Karanlik Hasan4,Cabioglu Neslihan5,Tukenmez Mustafa5,Emiroglu Selman5,Onder Semen6,Yildiz Sevda Ozel7,Yavuz Ekrem6,Saip Pınar3,Aydiner Adnan3,Igci Abdullah5,Muslumanoglu Mahmut5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, 34390, Capa, Turkey

2. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem University, Istanbul, Turkey

3. Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

4. Department of General Surgery, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

5. Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

6. Department of Pathology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine. Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

7. Department of Biostatistics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response evaluation. Methods: MR images of 50 locally advanced breast cancer patients who underwent standard protocol (SP) breast MRI before and after NAC were re-evaluated retrospectively. Abbreviated protocol (AP) was obtained by extracting images from SP and then evaluating them in a separate session. Protocols were compared with the histological findings after surgery as the reference standard. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the two protocols in response evaluation by the McNemar test (p=0.018). However, the Kappa value was 0.62 (p<0.001), which indicates substantial agreement. No statistically significant differences were found between the two protocols (AP and SP) and pathological results in the McNemar test (p=0.12, p=0.60, respectively). Kappa values were 0.48 (p<0.001) and 0.60 (p<0.001), respectively, which indicates moderate agreement for both protocols with higher values by SP evaluation. The residual maximum median diameters were smaller than the pathology, with both protocols (p<0.001). Conclusion: Despite the statistical differences, there was a significant correlation in response evaluation between the two protocols. The pathological results were moderately correlated with both protocols, with SP slightly higher. However, the residual maximum median diameters were smaller than the pathology with both protocols. These results may limit the use of AP in evaluating the local extent of the tumor, especially in patients who will undergo breast-conserving surgery.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3