Abstract
Background:
Seismic risk mitigation is an important issue in earthquake-prone countries, and needs to be solved in those complex communities governed by complex processes, where urban planning, socioeconomic dynamics, and, often, the need to preserve cultural assets are present simultaneously. In recent years, due to limited financial resources, mitigation activities have often been limited to post-earthquake events, and only a few in periods of inactivity, particularly in urban planning. At this point, a significant change in point of view is necessary.
Methods:
The seismic risk mitigation (and more generally, natural risk mitigation) must be considered as the main topic in urban planning and in the governance of communities. In fact, in several recent earthquakes, significant socioeconomic losses have been caused by the low or lack of resilience of the communities. This is mainly due to the high vulnerability of private buildings, in particular, housing units.
Results:
Therefore, in recent years, several studies have been conducted on the seismic resilience of communities. However, significant improvements are still needed for the resilience assessment of the housing stock, both qualitatively and quantitatively. In this study, which is applied to the housing system, a proposal regarding a change in urban planning and emergency management tools based on the concept of resilience is reported. As a first application, a case study in Italy is considered.
Conclusion:
The proposal is focused on defining and quantifying the improvement of the resilience of the communities and this must be obtained by modifying the current Civil Protection plan. New tools are based on a new resilience community plan by encompassing urban planning tools, resilient mitigation strategies, and consequently, emergency management planning.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Subject
Building and Construction
Reference32 articles.
1. Cimellaro GP.
New trends on resiliency research, 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
16WCEE 2017 Santiago Chile
2017.
2. Ceré G, Rezgui Y, Zhao W.
Critical review of existing built environment resilience frameworks: Directions for future research.
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct
2017.
3. McAllister T.
Developing guidelines and standards for disaster resilience of the built environment: A research needs assessment.
NIST Technical Note 1975
2013.
4. Anne Wein A, Rose AZ.
Economic Resilience Lessons from the Shake Out Earthquake Scenario.
Earthq Spectra
2011;
27
(2)
: 559-73.
5. Vona M, Harabaglia P, Murgante B.
Thinking about resilience cities studying Italian earthquake.
Urban Des Plan
2016;
169
: 185-99.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献