Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research
University, New Delhi, India
2. Department of Biological Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences, Pilani,
India
3. School of Allied Health Sciences and Management, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University,
New Delhi, India
4. Department of Cardiology, National Heart Institute, New Delhi, India
Abstract
Background:
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) continue to be the primary cause of
mortality globally and invariably in India as well. The rapid upsurge in the prevalence of CVDs
in India has created a pressing need to promote contemporary, sustainable, and cost-effective interventions
to tackle the CVD burden. This systematic review integrates the research-based evidence
of the cost-effectiveness of various interventions that can be adapted to control CVDs in
India.
Methods:
Databases, namely, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar, were
searched for data on the economic evaluation of interventions targeting CVD based on the Indian
population for a period of 30 years (1991-2021). Two reviewers assessed the articles for eligibility,
and data were extracted from the shortlisted articles as per a predefined template, including
the quantification of methodological aspects.
Results:
In total, 1249 studies were examined, out of which 23 completely met the inclusion criteria
for full-text review. A total of 16 studies were based solely on the Indian population, while
the rest (7) included South Asia/Asia for the intervention, of which India was a participant nation.
Most of the economic evaluations targeted treatment-based or pharmacological interventions
(14) for CVDs. The evaluations were based on Decision-based models (10), Randomized
controlled Trials (RCTs) (9), and Observational studies (4). The cost-effectiveness ratio for the
included studies exhibited a diverse range due to variations in methodological approaches, such
as differences in study settings, populations, and inconsistencies in study design. The mean
ICER (Incremental Cost-effectiveness ratio) for primordial and primary preventions was found
to be 3073.8 (US $2022) and 17489.9 (US $2022), respectively. Moreover, the combined mean
value for secondary and tertiary prevention was 2029.6 (US$2022).
Conclusion:
The economic evidence of public health interventions are expanding, but their focus
is restricted towards pharmacological interventions. There is an urgency to emphasize primordial
and primary prevention for better outcomes in health economics decision-making. Technology-
based avenues for intervention need more exploration in order to cater to a large population
like India.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.