Author:
Sobhy Amr,Saleh Lobna A.,Ali Mohamed Mourad,Refaat Sameh Ahmed
Abstract
Background:
In the present study, we aim to examine oral gabapentin efficacy as an adjuvant to spinal anesthesia.
Methods:
This prospective, clinical, randomized trial included subjects between 20 and 60 years undergoing lower limb surgeries categorized into two cohorts. Group (G) received gabapentin (900 mg) in two divided doses prior to spinal anesthesia; (300 mg 10 hrs prior to spinal anesthesia induction as well as 600 mg 2 hrs before spinal anesthesia). In contrast, the control Group (C) received only spinal anesthesia. The onset, as well as the duration of spinal anesthesia, were the primary outcome, while the secondary outcome was the postoperative nalbuphine consumed.
Results:
A total of 60 cases were evenly categorized into two cohorts. Both groups demonstrated no differences regarding motor and sensory block onset and duration. The group receiving preoperative gabapentin had a significant decrease in postoperative nalbuphine consumption with a mean of 20.8±9.4 mg compared to the control group, which showed an increased consumption of 28.9±10.4 mg with a p-value of 0.006. Further analysis of the Visual Analog Score (VAS) in both groups revealed that the decrease in total nalbuphine consumption was found at (8 and 10 hrs) postoperatively, with p values of 0.016 and 0009, respectively.
Conclusion:
Gabapentin administration (900 mg) within 10 hrs of surgery in two subdivided doses prior to spinal anesthesia had no effect on onset and duration of spinal anesthesia but had a delayed beneficial postoperative analgesic effect.
Clinical Trial Registration Number:
This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05659810, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05659810in 21st December 2022.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference25 articles.
1. Sun S, Wang J, Bao N, Chen Y, Wang J.
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as local anesthetic adjuvants in spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Drug Des Devel Ther
2017;
11
: 3413-24.
2. Eroglu A, Apan A, Erturk E, Ben-Shlomo I.
Comparison of the anesthetic techniques.
Sci World J
2015;
2015
: 1-2.
3. Sapate M, Sahu P, Thatte WS, Dubey R.
A randomized, double blind, control study of the effects of adding nalbuphine to spinal bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgeries in elderly patients.
Anaesth Pain Intensive Care
2013;
17
(2)
: 145-8.
4. Matsuki A.
Nothing new under the sun-a Japanese pioneer in the clinical use of intrathecal morphine.
Anesthesiology
1983;
58
(3)
: 289-90.
5. Weigl W, Bieryło A, Krzemień-Wiczyńska S, Mayzner-Zawadzka E.
Comparative study of postoperative analgesia after intrathecal administration of bupivacaine with fentanyl or morphine for elective Caesarean section.
Anestezjol Intens Ter
2009;
41
(1)
: 28-32.