Comparisons of Forecasting for Survival Outcome for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma by using Machine Learning Models based on Multi-omics

Author:

Huang Daizheng12,Mo Liying1,Su Yuangang13,Yuan Jianhui12,Xiao Zhiwei4,Zhang Ziyan5,Lan Xiuwan1

Affiliation:

1. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

2. The Laboratory of Biomedical Photonics and Engineering, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China

3. Research Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China

4. School of Information and Management, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China

5. Life Sciences Institute, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China

Abstract

Background: Machine learning methods showed excellent predictive ability in a wide range of fields. For the survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), its multi-omics influence is crucial. This study attempts to establish a variety of machine learning multi-omics models to predict the survival of HNSC and find the most suitable machine learning prediction method. Method: The HNSC clinical data and multi-omics data were downloaded from the TCGA database. The important variables were screened by the LASSO algorithm. We used a total of 12 supervised machine learning models to predict the outcome of HNSC survival and compared the results. In vitro qPCR was performed to verify core genes predicted by the random forest algorithm. Results: For omics of HNSC, the results of the twelve models showed that the performance of multiomics was better than each single-omic alone. Results were presented, which showed that the Bayesian network(BN) model (area under the curve [AUC] 0.8250, F1 score=0.7917) and random forest(RF) model (area under the curve [AUC] 0.8002,F1 score=0.7839) played good prediction performance in HNSC multi-omics data. The results of in vitro qPCR were consistent with the RF algorithm. Conclusion: Machine learning methods could better forecast the survival outcome of HNSC. Meanwhile, this study found that the BN model and the RF model were the most superior. Moreover, the forecast result of multi-omics was better than single-omic alone in HNSC.

Funder

Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Innovation Research Team

Guangxi Natural Science Foundation

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3