Author:
Mashoufi Mehrnaz,Ayatollahi Haleh,Khorasani-Zavareh Davoud
Abstract
Introduction:Data quality is an important issue in emergency medicine. The unique characteristics of emergency care services, such as high turn-over and the speed of work may increase the possibility of making errors in the related settings. Therefore, regular data quality assessment is necessary to avoid the consequences of low quality data. This study aimed to identify the main dimensions of data quality which had been assessed, the assessment approaches, and generally, the status of data quality in the emergency medical services.Methods:The review was conducted in 2016. Related articles were identified by searching databases, including Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed and Web of Science. All of the review and research papers related to data quality assessment in the emergency care services and published between 2000 and 2015 (n=34) were included in the study.Results:The findings showed that the five dimensions of data quality; namely, data completeness, accuracy, consistency, accessibility, and timeliness had been investigated in the field of emergency medical services. Regarding the assessment methods, quantitative research methods were used more than the qualitative or the mixed methods. Overall, the results of these studies showed that data completeness and data accuracy requires more attention to be improved.Conclusion:In the future studies, choosing a clear and a consistent definition of data quality is required. Moreover, the use of qualitative research methods or the mixed methods is suggested, as data users’ perspectives can provide a broader picture of the reasons for poor quality data.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference62 articles.
1. Haug A, Zachariassen F, Van Liempd D. The costs of poor data quality. Indust Engg Manag 2011; 4 (2) : 168-93.
2. Moges H-T, Dejaeger K, Lemahieu W, Baesens B. A multidimensional analysis of data quality for credit risk management: New insights and challenges. Inf Manage 2013; 50 (1) : 43-58.
3. Carey M, Ceri S, Bernstein P, et al. Data-centric Systems and Applications 2006.
4. Sebastian-Coleman L. Measuring data quality for ongoing improvement: a data quality assessment framework 2013.
5. Haux R. Health information systems - past, present, future. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 (3-4) : 268-81.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献