Author:
Surakunprapha Palakorn,Pradubwong Suteera,Jenwitheesuk Kamonwan,Pisek Poonsak,Chowchuen Bowornsilp
Abstract
Background:
Cleft Lip and Palate (CLP) negatively affect the quality of life (QoL) and nasolabial appearance, especially in preteen patients who start to be interested in their own appearance and society.
Objective:
The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of plastic surgery for Thai preteen CLP patients through their satisfaction with their QoL and nasolabial appearance.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study covered purposively selected 30 samples aged between 8 and 12 years old.Their satisfaction with their QoL and appearance was reflected through an interview and a questionnaire with the cooperation of their parents as their caregivers including satisfaction with their nasolabial appearance evaluated by five experts. They compared the photos of patients’nasolabial appearance with those of normal faces of children of the same age using 5-rating scales.
Results:
General findings showed 53.3% of samples were male patients with mostly (63.3%) UCLP whose parents were mainly (73.3%) poor, so they relied on government financial supports for the treatment. Only some (15%) earned up to 5,001 to 10,000 baht per month because of their low education with just high school level. Specific findings indicated the overall satisfaction with QoL through five dimensions at average level (3.26±1.39). This was based on the satisfaction with the center services, the overall treatments, the medical additional costs, parental satisfaction with psychosocial effects including concerns about the impacts of CLP on the family ranged from high to low i.e. 4.30±0.98, 3.72±1.15, 3.70±1.14, 3.33±1.08 and 2.81±1.46 respectively. Moreover, five experts trended to be highly satisfied with patients’ nasolabial appearance by rating it from Good (53.3%) to Fair (43.43%) with only Poor (3.3%).
Conclusion:
The good cost-effectiveness of the surgery was represented through the average and high satisfaction of CLP patients with their QoL and their appearance respectively indicating the absence of disability weights for these treated CLP patients.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference33 articles.
1. Fuangtharnthip P, Chonnapasatid W, Thiradilok S, Manopatanakul S, Jaruratanasirikul S.
Registry-based study of prevalence of cleft lip/palate in Thailand from 2012 to 2015.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
2021;
58
(11)
: 1430-7.
2. Chowchuen B, Surakunprapha P, Winaikosol K, Punyavong P, Kiatchoosakun P, Pradubwong S.
Birth prevalence and risk factors associated with CL/P in Thailand.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
2021;
58
(5)
: 557-66.
3. Nayir T, Uskun E, Yürekli MV, Devran H, Çelik A, Okyay RA.
Does body image affect quality of life?: a population based study.
PLoS One
2016;
11
(9)
: e0163290.
4. Damiano PC, Tyler MC, Romitti PA, et al.
Health-related quality of life among preadolescent children with oral clefts: the mother’s perspective.
Pediatrics
2007;
120
(2)
: e283-90.
5. Brock D.
Ethical issues in the use of cost effectiveness analysis for the prioritization of health care resources.
Making choices in health: WHO Guide to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
2003;
289-312.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献