Affiliation:
1. School of Public Policy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
Abstract
Background:
Recent push for ‘energy democracy’ necessitates a well-informed citizenry
vis-à-vis energy policy, especially in the wake of ideologically charged and divergent views
about the existence and severity of climate change among American citizens. Citizens’ involvement
in energy policy processes in democratic countries makes it important to assess the depth and
scope of energy policy awareness and knowledge among the public, as well as to consider the factors
that promote or hinder how informed people are about energy policy issues.
Objectives:
This study aims at examining the levels of public informedness and knowledge of energy
policy and analyzing their potential correlates in the western U.S. states of California, Idaho,
Oregon, and Washington. The study also analyzes the impact of public awareness and knowledge
on public support for government funding for renewable energy technology research.
Methods:
Using survey data of 1804 randomly selected respondents from California, Idaho, Oregon,
and Washington, the study employs ordinal logistic regression to trans-situational and situational
models predicting self-assessed informedness and objective measure of knowledge about
energy policy as well as public support for federal funding for renewable energy technology research.
Results:
The study found that variables related to socio-economic status (SES) are stronger predictors
of public informedness and knowledge about energy policy than situational variables like values
and efficacy, except for climate change beliefs that have a positive relationship with informedness
and knowledge.
Conclusion:
The study also found that informedness and knowledge of energy policy are positively
associated with support for government funding for renewable energy research.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference86 articles.
1. Hmiel B.; Petrenko V.V.; Dyonisius M.N.; Buizert C.; Smith A.M.; Place P.F.; Harth C.; Beaudette R.; Hua Q.; Yang B.; Vimont I.; Michel S.E.; Severinghaus J.P.; Etheridge D.; Bromley T.; Schmitt J.; Faïn X.; Weiss R.F.; Dlugokencky E.; Preindustrial 14CH4 indicates greater anthropogenic fossil CH4 emissions. Nature 2020,578(7795),409-412
2. Tyson A.; Kennedy B.; Two-thirds of americans think government should do more on climate pew research center science Available from: (Accessed: Oct. 12, 2021).
3. Erikson R.S.; Wright G.; McIver J.P.; Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States 1993
4. Jones B.D.; Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance 2001
5. Ostrom E.; Cox M.; Schlager E.; An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework and Introduction of the Social-Ecological System Framework. Theories of the Policy Process 2014,267-306
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献