Affiliation:
1. College of Computer and Information Technology, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang 473061, Henan, China
Abstract
Background:
In universities, the course of Java programming is widely offered.It contains
many contents and is practical. Therefore, learning Java programming is considered to be a difficult
and challenging task for beginners. That is to say, students must learn a lot of programming skills
in order to effectively master the course. However, it is often reported that the result of teaching Java
programming is poor, mainly reflected in the stereotyped teaching methods, lack of project development
experience and so on. In order to investigate and solve these problems, many educational experts
have conducted in-depth research about it. CDIO (Conceiving-Designing-Implementing-Operating)
engineering education model is the latest achievement of engineering education reform in recent years.
It is a life cycle from product development to product operation as the carrier, which enables students
to learn engineering in an active, practical and comprehensive way. For the problems in Java programming
course, the concept of CDIO engineering is introduced to solve them.
Methods:
Firstly, the research status of Java programming course and the application of CDIO model
were analysed. Secondly, the current situation of learning was analysed by means of questionnaire survey.
At the same time, the main problems existing in the current teaching project were listed. Following
this, the questionnaire method was used to analyse the current learning situation of Java programming
course. The ideas of CDIO engineering education and iteration mode were applied to Java programming
course. From various perspectives, this paper makes a detailed analysis of the development
methods and strategies of the new teaching mode. Finally, the teaching model was applied to the existing
teaching process. The teaching effect of the model was verified by data statistics.
Results:
The experimental results show that the new teaching mode encouraged students to master
programming knowledge as well as problem-solving strategies. Students' interest in learning has
been increased and their comprehensive ability has also been improved. Compared with traditional
teaching methods, teachers tend to adopt CDIO teaching methods. The data statistics of teaching effect
include six aspects: learning initiative, learning interest, knowledge-related ability, communication
ability and practical ability, practical skills and final examination scores. The final exam results
also showed that students with the new method performed better than those being taught with the
older teaching method.
Conclusion:
A new teaching model based on graded iteration and CDIO Engineering education
mode is proposed for the problems existing in the teaching process of Java programming course.
This paper creatively combines CDIO engineering ideas with Java programming course, and introduces
the idea of hierarchical iteration. According to this idea, the knowledge structure of the course
is put forward, and the teaching method of CDIO is adopted to attract students to study Java programming.
The basic characteristics of the teaching mode are that the project is taken as the main
line, the teacher as the leading role, and the students as the main body, so as to cultivate the students'
comprehensive engineering ability. By strengthening the classroom teaching and practice teaching,
the new model improves the Java teaching process, and enhances the teaching effect. The teaching
practice proves that the new teaching model can mobilize the enthusiasm of students and improve
the students' practical ability. It is worthy of popularizing.
Funder
Science and Technology Department, Henan Province
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference48 articles.
1. T,Amira.; M,Lamia.; M,Hafidi. Implementation and evalua-tion of flipped algorithmic class, ” Int, J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. 15, Issue 1,1-12,2019. [http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2019010101].
2. B,Tomic.; J,Jovanovic.; N,Milikic.; V,Devedžic.; S,Dimitrijevic.; D.Ðuric.; Z.Ševarac. Grading students' programming and soft skills with open badges: A case study, ” Br, J. Educ. Technol. 50, Issue 2,518-530,2019.
3. S.I,Malik.; J,Coldwell-Neilson. Impact of a new teaching and learning approach in an introductory programming course, ” J. Educ. Comput. Res. 55, Issue 6,789-819,2017. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735633116685852].
4. A,Nordby.; S,Karlsen. Teaching ‘hardcorescience’ to arts and design students: Reflections on the development of a basic pro-gramming course. Information, ” Nordic J. Art Res. 3, Issue 2,43-46,2014.
5. H,Chen.; S,Brennan. Sadler, The effects of first programming language on college students’ computing attitude and achievement: A comparison of graphical and textual languages, ” Comput. Sci. Educ. 29, Issue 1,23-48,2019. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1547564] .......... .... ...ÿ.. . ÿ.. . ÿ.. . ÿ . ............ ....... .................................
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献