A Validated Non-compendial Method for Determination of Haemodialysis Concentrate’s Contents and its Comparison with Compendial Method: Application of ISO 13958:2014 Standard

Author:

Ahmed Mahmood1ORCID,Ahmad Saghir2,Hussain Riaz3,Khaleeq Anum4,Khan Iram5

Affiliation:

1. Renacon Pharma Limited, Lahore-54600, Pakistan

2. Institute of Chemistry, University of the Punjab, Lahore-54590, Pakistan

3. Department of Chemistry, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan

4. Department of Chemistry, Govt Kinnaird College, Lahore, Pakistan

5. Department of Chemistry, Queen Mary College, Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract

Background: Haemodialysis is a process to remove the waste products and excess fluids that build up in the human body when kidneys stop working. Haemodialysis concentrate consists of two parts, acid concentrate (Part A) that contains mineral ions (Na, K, Mg and Ca) and buffering agent acetic acid /citric acid whereas basic concentrate (Part B) comprises sodium bicarbonate alone or in combination with sodium chloride. Aim: Present research aimed to develop and validate a rapid method for the determination of cations and anions in haemodialysis concentrates in solution and powder form by choosing one technique among various suggested in ISO 13958:2014. Methods: The analysis was done by flame emission (flame photometer), atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS), polarimetric and titrimetric techniques. ICH guidelines were followed for method validation by addressing the linearity, accuracy, precision and detection limits (LOD and LOQ). Results and Discussion: The calibration curves were linear for Mg, Ca, K and Na with coefficient of determination (R2) ≥ 0.9978 and regression data indicating the excellent linearity for the selected concentration range for each content. The recovery results were obtained between the ranges 96.9-102.5 % which were good enough to justify the suitability of the proposed method for its intended applications. Statistical analysis indicated that there was no significant difference was observed between the proposed and compendial method at 95 % confidence of interval. Conclusion: The advantage of the proposed method over the compendial method by virtue of its economy and fast with reliable results because more reagents and chemicals are consumed in the compendial method.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Pharmaceutical Science,Molecular Medicine,Biochemistry,Biophysics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3