Affiliation:
1. Department of Chemistry, Royal Global University, Betkuchi, Guwahati -781035, Assam, India
2. Department
of Chemical Sciences, Tezpur University, Napaam, Tezpur -784028, Assam, India
Abstract
Background:
Anticancer activity of 9-anilinoacridine derivatives has been well
reported. Although, the DNA-drug sequence-specific binding of these compounds may be
affected by the substituent(s) on the aniline ring, it is still unclear which substituent (NH2
or CH2–OH) on the anilino ring of the compound is the critical element. A good understanding
of chemical properties such as steric, lipophilic and electronic properties at the molecular
level may provide important background for mutagenic and carcinogenic properties.
Objectives:
The present study is an attempt to understand the reactive nature of some selected
9-anilinoacridine derivatives in both gas and solvent phases and to predict their anticancer
activity by QSAR analysis.
Methods:
Full geometry optimizations of all derivatives were carried out at gradient corrected
DFT using DMol3 program. We used DNP basis set in combination with BLYP to
study all the derivatives. The molecular mechanics parameters used for QSAR analysis
were calculated using Hyperchem software.
Results:
We found Compound (31) (R=COOC6H5) as the most stable compound and compound
(6) (R1= NO2) as the most reactive one in both gas and solvent phases. Fukui function
(f+) values of all the atoms showed that N10 is the most reactive atom in each of the molecule
which indicates that N10 is the preferred site for nucleophilic attack. The final QSAR
model with four parameters (electrophilicity, hardness, surface area, and molar refractivity)
is capable of predicting anticancer activity of the compounds against leukemic HL-60 cell
lines with r2 = 0.91 and 0.88 in both gas and solvent phases, respectively.
Conclusion:
The global and local reactivity descriptors, such as hardness, chemical potential,
electrophilicity index, Fukui function, and local philicity were calculated to understand
the reactive nature and reactive sites of the compounds. The comparative QSAR study
with the help of DFT and MM + techniques provides the importance of the selected descriptors
in predicting the activity of the selected derivatives.
Funder
Science and Engineering Research Board
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Reference42 articles.
1. Legha S.S.; Gutterman J.U.; Hall S.W.; Benjamin R.S.; Burgess M.A.; Valdivieso M.; Bodey G.P.; Phase 1 clinical investigation of 4′-(9-acridinylamino) methanesulfon-m-anisidide (NSC 249992), a new acridine derivative. Cancer Res 1978,38(11 Pt 1),3712-3716
2. Arlin Z.A.; Current status of amsacrine (AMSA) combination chemotherapy programs in acute leukemia. Cancer Treat Rep 1983,67(11),967-970
3. Shoemaker D.D.; Cysyk R.L.; Gormley P.E.; DeSouza J.J.V.; Malspeis L.; Metabolism of 4′-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide by rat liver microsomes. Cancer Res 1984,44(5),1939-1945
4. Shoemaker D.D.; Cysyk R.L.; Padmanabhan S.; Bhat H.B.; Malspeis L.; Identification of the principal biliary me-tabolite of 4′-(9-acridinylamino) methanesulfon-m-anisidide in rats. Drug Metab Dispos 1982,10(1),35-39
5. Su T.L.; Chou T.C.; Kim J.Y.; Huang J.T.; Ciszewska G.; Ren W.Y.; Otter G.M.; Sirotnak F.M.; Watanabe K.A.; 9-substituted acridine derivatives with long half-life and potent antitumor activity: Synthesis and structure-activity rela-tionships. J Med Chem 1995,38(17),3226-3235