Affiliation:
1. Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
2. Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
Abstract
Background:
Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) by flow diverter
(FD) stents depends on flow modification. Patient-specific modeling of FD deployment and
computational fluid dynamics (CFD) could enable a priori endovascular strategy optimization. We
developed a fast, simplistic, expansion-free balls-weeping algorithm to model FDs in patientspecific
aneurysm geometry. However, since such strong simplification could result in less accurate
simulations, we also developed a fast virtual stenting workflow (VSW) that explicitly models
stent expansion using pseudo-physical forces.
Methods:
To test which of these two fast algorithms more accurately simulates real FDs, we
applied them to virtually treat three representative patient-specific IAs. We deployed Pipeline
Embolization Device into 3 patient-specific silicone aneurysm phantoms and simulated the treatments
using both balls-weeping and VSW algorithms in computational aneurysm models. We then
compared the virtually deployed FD stents against experimental results in terms of geometry and
post-treatment flow fields. For stent geometry, we evaluated gross configurations and porosity. For
post-treatment aneurysmal flow, we compared CFD results against experimental measurements by
particle image velocimetry.
Results:
We found that VSW created more realistic FD deployments than balls-weeping in terms
of stent geometry, porosity and pore density. In particular, balls-weeping produced unrealistic FD
bulging at the aneurysm neck, and this artifact drastically increased with neck size. Both FD
deployment methods resulted in similar flow patterns, but the VSW had less error in flow velocity
and inflow rate.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, modeling stent expansion is critical for preventing unrealistic bulging
effects and thus should be considered in virtual FD deployment algorithms. Also endowed with its
high computational efficiency and superior accuracy, the VSW algorithm is a better candidate for
implementation into a bedside clinical tool for FD deployment simulation.
Funder
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Subject
Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Developmental Neuroscience,Neurology
Reference32 articles.
1. Becske T.; Kallmes D.F.; Saatci I.; Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013,267(3),858-868
2. Brinjikji W.; Murad M.H.; Lanzino G.; Cloft H.J.; Kallmes D.F.; Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: A meta-analysis. Stroke 2013,44(2),442-447
3. Ikeda H.; Ishii A.; Kikuchi T.; Delayed aneurysm rupture due to residual blood flow at the inflow zone of the intracranial paraclinoid internal carotid aneurysm treated with the Pipeline embolization device: Histopathological investigation. J Perither Neuroradiol Surg Proc Relat Neurosci 2015,21(6),674-683
4. Ma D.; Dargush G.F.; Natarajan S.K.; Levy E.I.; Siddiqui A.H.; Meng H.; Computer modeling of deployment and mechanical expansion of neurovascular flow diverter in patient-specific intracranial aneurysms. J Biomech 2012,45(13),2256-2263
5. Ma D.; Dumont T.M.; Kosukegawa H.; High fidelity virtual stenting (HiFiVS) for intracranial aneurysm flow diversion: In vitro and in silico. Ann Biomed Eng 2013,41(10),2143-2156
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献