Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Tunisian Renal Transplant
Patients during the Tuberculosis Infection: A Retrospective, Observational,
Single-centre Analysis
-
Published:2023-08
Issue:3
Volume:18
Page:340-344
-
ISSN:1574-8863
-
Container-title:Current Drug Safety
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:CDS
Author:
Ammar Helmi1ORCID,
Sassi Mouna Ben1,
Charfi Rim1,
Jebar Hanene El1,
Daghfous Riadh1,
Gaies Emna1,
Trabelsi Sameh1
Affiliation:
1. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology Research Laboratory, National Centre Chalbi Belkahia of Pharmacovigilance,
Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar-Tunis 1068, Tunisia
Abstract
Abstract:
Tuberculosis is a challenge in organ transplantation due to the interaction between Anti-
Tuberculosis Treatment (ATT) and immunosuppressive drugs, such as Tacrolimus (TAC). This
study aimed to assess this interaction and discuss the guidelines used in this specific case.
Methods:
A retrospective, observational, single-center analysis was performed at the Department
of Clinical Pharmacology (National Centre of Pharmacovigilance, Tunisia). We analyzed the database
of patients who received TAC from 2009 until 2018. We included samples provided from renal
transplant patients infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis after transplantation. Trough blood
levels (C0) were determined using an immunoassay analyzer. The Therapeutic Range (TR) of TAC
was considered between 5 and 10 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between the
period of co-administration of TAC/ATT (period A) and the period during which patients received
only TAC (period B).
Results:
Seven renal transplant patients treated by TAC were included. 41 samples were analyzed
(16; period A, 25; period B). Only 6 % of C0 values were found within TR during period A, while
this rate was 44% during period B. During period A, 88% of TAC C0 was under the lower limit of
TR, indicating a high risk of transplant rejection. The mean C0 and C0/D were significantly lower
during period A (3.11±1.53 ng/mL vs 7.11 ± 3.37 ng/mL; p = 0.001 and 33.06 ± 24.89 vs 83.14 ±
44.46; p = 0.0006, respectively), without difference in doses between periods.
Conclusion:
Considering the results of this study, clinicians are suggested to monitor TAC closely
in this particular circumstance.
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,Toxicology