Positive and Negative Effects of Antipsychotic Medication: An International Online Survey of 832 Recipients

Author:

Read John1,Williams James2

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom

2. Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Background: Antipsychotic medication is currently the treatment of choice for psychosis, but few studies directly survey the first-hand experience of recipients. Objective: To ascertain the experiences and opinions of an international sample of users of antipsychotic drugs, regarding positive and negative effects. Methods: An online direct-to-consumer questionnaire was completed by 832 users of antipsychotics, from 30 countries – predominantly USA, UK and Australia. This is the largest such sample to date. Results: Over half (56%) thought, the drugs reduced the problems they were prescribed for, but 27% thought they made them worse. Slightly less people found the drugs generally ‘helpful’ (41%) than found them ‘unhelpful’ (43%). While 35% reported that their ‘quality of life’ was ‘improved’, 54% reported that it was made ‘worse’. The average number of adverse effects reported was 11, with an average of five at the ‘severe’ level. Fourteen effects were reported by 57% or more participants, most commonly: ‘Drowsiness, feeling tired, sedation’ (92%), ‘Loss of motivation’ (86%), ‘Slowed thoughts’ (86%), and ‘Emotional numbing’ (85%). Suicidality was reported to be a side effect by 58%. Older people reported particularly poor outcomes and high levels of adverse effects. Duration of treatment was unrelated to positive outcomes but significantly related to negative outcomes. Most respondents (70%) had tried to stop taking the drugs. The most common reasons people wanted to stop were the side effects (64%) and worries about long-term physical health (52%). Most (70%) did not recall being told anything at all about side effects. Conclusion: Clinical implications are discussed, with a particular focus on the principles of informed consent, and involving patients in decision making about their own lives.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,Toxicology

Reference50 articles.

1. Hutton P.; Weinmann S.; Bola J.; Read J.; Models of madness: Psychological, social and biological approaches to psychosis In: Read J, Dillon J, Eds.2013,105-124

2. Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults Quality standard National Institute for Health and Care Excellence2015

3. American Psychiatric Association Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia 2010

4. Leucht S.; Arbter D.; Engel R.; Kissling W.; Davis J.; How effective are second-generation antipsychotic drugs? Mol Psychiatry 2009,14,429-447

5. Lepping P.; Sambhi R.; Whittington R.; Lane S.; Poole R.; Clinical relevance of findings in trials of antipsychotics: Systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 2011,198,341-345

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3