Comparison of Triflusal with Aspirin in the Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events; Α Randomised Clinical Trial
-
Published:2019-10-02
Issue:6
Volume:17
Page:635-643
-
ISSN:1570-1611
-
Container-title:Current Vascular Pharmacology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:CVP
Author:
Kalantzi Kallirroi I.1, Ntalas Ioannis V.1, Chantzichristos Vasileios G.2, Tsoumani Maria E.2, Adamopoulos Dimitrios2, Asimakopoulos Christos2, Bourdakis Adamantios3, Darmanis Petros2, Dimitriadou Alexandra2, Gkiokas Stefanos2, Ipeirotis Konstantinos2, Kitikidou Kyriaki2, Klonaris Ioannis2, Kostaki Aglaia2, Logothetis Dimitrios2, Mainas Konstantinos2, Mais Theodoros2, Maragiannis Athanasios2, Martiadou Konstantina2, Mavronasos Konstantinos2, Michelongonas Ioannis2, Mitropoulos Dimitrios2, Papadimitriou Georgios2, Papadopoulos Achilleas2, Papaioakeim Miltiadis4, Sofillas Kosmas2, Stabola Sotiria2, Stefanakis Emmanouil2, Stergiou Dimitrios2, Thoma Maria2, Zenetos Alexandros2, Zisekas Stergios2, Goudevenos John A.1, Panagiotakos Demosthenes B.5, Tselepis Alexandros D.2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece 2. Department of Chemistry, Atherothrombosis Research Centre, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece 3. Internal Medicine, Diabetes and Metabolism Unit, Trikala General Hospital, Trikala, Greece 4. Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Komotini, Komotini, Greece 5. School of Health Science & Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece
Abstract
Background:
Triflusal has demonstrated an efficacy similar to aspirin in the prevention of
vascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction (ΜΙ) and ischaemic stroke but with less
bleeding events.
Objective:
We performed a randomised, multicentre, phase 4 clinical trial to compare the clinical efficacy
and safety of triflusal versus aspirin, administered for 12 months in patients eligible to receive a
cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibitor.
Methods:
Patients with stable coronary artery disease or with a history of non-cardioembolic ischaemic
stroke were randomly assigned to receive either triflusal 300 mg twice or 600 mg once daily or aspirin
100 mg once daily for 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of: (a) ΜΙ, (b)
stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), or, (c) death from vascular causes for the entire follow-up period.
The primary safety endpoints were the rate of bleeding events as defined by Bleeding Academic Research
Consortium (BARC) criteria.
Results:
At 12-month follow-up, an equivalent result was revealed between the triflusal (n=559) and
aspirin (n=560) in primary efficacy endpoint. Specifically, the combined efficacy outcome rate (i.e. MI,
stroke or death from vascular causes) difference was equal to -1.3% (95% confidence interval -1.1 to
3.5) and lied within the a-priori defined equivalence interval (p<0.001). Regarding the primary safety
endpoints, patients on triflusal treatment were 50% less likely to develop bleeding events according to
the BARC criteria, and especially any clinically overt sign of haemorrhage that requires diagnostic studies,
hospitalisation or special treatment (BARC type 2).
Conclusion:
The efficacy of triflusal in the secondary prevention of vascular events is similar to aspirin
when administered for 12 months. Importantly, triflusal significantly reduced the incidence of ΜΙ and
showed a better safety profile compared with aspirin.
:
(ASpirin versus Triflusal for Event Reduction In Atherothrombosis Secondary prevention, ASTERIAS
trial; Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02616497).
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pharmacology
Reference21 articles.
1. Eikelboom J.W.; Hirsh J.; Spencer F.A.; Baglin T.P.; Weitz J.I.; Antiplatelet
drugs: Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis,
9th ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based
clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2012,141,89-119 2. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration.Collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002,324,71-86 3. Michelson A.D.; Antiplatelet therapies for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010,9,154-169 4. Krasopoulos G.; Brister S.J.; Beattie W.S.; Buchanan M.R.; Aspirin “resistance” and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008,336,195-198 5. Snoep J.D.; Hovens M.M.; Eikenboom J.C.; van der Bom J.G.; Huisman M.V.; Association of laboratory-defined aspirin resistance with a higher risk of recurrent cardiovascular events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2007,167,1593-1599
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|