Development and Implementation of the Hdc.DrApp.la and SIMDA Programs to Reduce Polypharmacy and Drug-drug Interactions in Patients Hospitalized in Internal Medicine

Author:

Barcia Ricardo Enrique12ORCID,Keller Guillermo Alberto3ORCID,Azzato Francisco1ORCID,Diez Roberto Alejandro3ORCID,Sielecki Mathias2ORCID,Kleine Ricardo Samson2ORCID,Lescano Juan Alberto4ORCID,Giunti Guido5

Affiliation:

1. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Hospital de Cliìnicas “Joseì de San Martiìn”, 6o Caìtedra de Medicina Interna, Argentina

2. DrApp, Empresa de Desarrollos Informaìticos para Medicina, Buenos Aires, Argentina

3. Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Toxicologiìa y Farmacologiìa, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Centro de Vigilancia y Seguridad de Medicamentos, Buenos Aires, Argentina

4. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Hospital de Cliìnicas “Joseì de San Martiìn”, Direccioìn de Informaìtica, Buenos Aires, Argentina

5. Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated polypharmacy and possible drug-drug interactions (p-DDIs) in hospitalized patients before and after using the SIMDA Computerized Medical Decision Support System (CMDSS). Materials and Methods: We included the prescriptions of ≥ 18 years hospitalized patients in the internal medicine department. We developed and implemented the Hdc.DrApp Physician Order Entry System and the CMDSS SIMDA, which detects p-DDIs and signals dosage adjustment based on renal function. To evaluate the impact of the CMDSS, we made a comparison Before (Survey) / After (Intervention): Survey between Oct/22/2019, and Mar/21/2020, and Intervention between Apr/4/2020 and Sep/3/2020. We analyze prescriptions from the first day and after the first day. We compared the number of drugs, polypharmacy (≥ 5 drugs), excessive polypharmacy (≥ 10 drugs), and p-DDIs. We evaluated differences with the X2 test, Yates correction, Fisher's exact test, ANOVA, and post hoc tests according to their characteristics. Results: We evaluated 2,834 admissions: Survey 1,211 and Intervention 1,623. The number of drugs per patient was 6.02 (± 3.20) in Survey and 5.17 (± 3.22) in Intervention (p < 0.001) on the first day and 9.68 (± 5.60) in Survey and 7.22 (± 4.93) in Intervention (p < 0.001) throughout the hospitalization. Polypharmacy was present in 64% of the Survey and 53% of Interventions (RR: 0.83 (0.78-0.88); and excessive polypharmacy in 14% of the Survey and 10% of Intervention (RR: 0.73, 0.60-0.90). The frequency of total p-DDIs was 1.91/patient (± 4.11) in Survey and 0.35 (± 0.81) in the Intervention (p < 0.001). Conclusion: We developed and implemented the Hdc.DrApp and SIMDA systems that were easy to use and allowed us to quantify and reduce polypharmacy and p-DDIs.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Pharmacology,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3