Association Splitting for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review

Author:

Ching Terence H.W.1ORCID,Jelinek Lena2ORCID,Hauschildt Marit2,Williams Monnica T.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Road, Unit 1020, Storrs, CT 06269- 1020, United States

2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

Abstract

Background: Association splitting is a cognitive technique that targets obsessions in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) by weakening biased semantic associations among OCDrelevant concepts. Objective: In this systematic review, we examine studies on the efficacy of association splitting for reducing OCD symptoms. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, six studies were included, with diversity in sample characteristics, mode of administration (i.e., self-help vs therapist-assisted), language of administration, comparator groups, etc. Results: Results indicated that association splitting, as a self-help intervention, was efficacious in reducing overall OCD symptom severity, specific OCD symptoms (i.e., sexual obsessions), subclinical unwanted intrusions, and thought suppression, with small-to-large effect sizes (e.g., across relevant studies, ds = .28-1.07). Findings were less clear when association splitting was administered on a therapist-assisted basis as an add-on to standard cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT). Nonetheless, across studies, the majority of participants reported high acceptability, ease of comprehension, and adherence to daily association splitting practice. Conclusion: Although association splitting is an efficacious and acceptable self-help intervention for OCD symptoms, future studies should include appropriate comparison groups, conduct longitudinal assessments, examine efficacy for different symptom dimensions, and assess changes in semantic networks as proof of mechanistic change. There should also be greater representation of marginalized groups in future studies to assess association splitting’s utility in circumventing barriers to face-to-face CBT. Ethical considerations are also discussed.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3