Numerical Analysis of Convergent-Divergent Angles and Operating Conditions Impact on Rocket Nozzle Performance Parameters
-
Published:2024-03-11
Issue:
Volume:16
Page:3-14
-
ISSN:2247-4528
-
Container-title:INCAS BULLETIN
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:INCAS BULLETIN
Author:
ALILI Nabila1, KADDOURI Khacem2, MOKADEM Salem2, ALAMI Ahmed3
Affiliation:
1. Laboratory of Physical Mechanics of Materials (LMPM), Mechanical Engineering Department, Djillali Liabes University, City Larbi Ben Mhidi, P.O. Box 89, 22000 Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria, alili.16nabila@gmail.com, nabila.alili@univ-sba.dz 2. Laboratory of Physical Mechanics of Materials (LMPM), Mechanical Engineering Department, Djillali Liabes University, City Larbi Ben Mhidi, P.O. Box 89, 22000 Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria 3. Laboratory of Process Engineering, Materials and Environment, Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria
Abstract
Comprehensive numerical analysis was conducted to elucidate the exhaust performance of rocket engine nozzles. The study focused on unravelling the intricate relationship between convergence and divergence angles and their impact on the exhaust performance parameters, including velocity coefficient (cv), angularity coefficient (Ca), and gross thrust coefficient (Cfg). In contrast to conventional studies that focus mainly on the divergent section, this research delved into both convergent and divergent aspects of nozzle geometry. For the convergent section, a range of angles from 20° to 45° was systematically examined. For the divergent section, a wide spectrum of angles was explored, ranging from small (10°-13°), medium (14°-19°) and large (20°-25°) divergent angles. Further, we venture beyond geometry, investigating the influence of nozzle pressure ratio (NPR) on these key metrics. Realisable 𝑘𝑘−𝜀𝜀, enhanced wall traitement was used to simulate nozzle flow. The study identified the optimal convergent angle at 37.5°. The 15° diverging angle provides good overall performance, while the 23° angle strikes the ideal compromise: maximizing thrust and efficiency while minimizing weight and maintaining optimal performance.
Publisher
INCAS - National Institute for Aerospace Research Elie Carafoli
Reference13 articles.
1. [1] R. Ande and V. N. K. Yerraboina, Numerical investigation on effect of divergent angle in convergent-divergent rocket engine nozzle, Chemical Engineering Transactions, vol. 66, pp. 787–792, 2018, 2283-9216, doi: https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1866132 2. [2] J. O¨ stlund and B. Muhammad-Klingmann, Supersonic flow separation with application to rocket engine nozzles, Appl. Mech. Rev., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 143–177, 2005, 0003-6900, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1894402 3. [3] H. L. G. Sunley and V. N. Ferriman, Jet separation in conical nozzles, The Aeronautical Journal, vol. 68, no. 648, pp. 808–817, 1964, 0368-3931, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0368393100081086 4. [4] D. Migdal and R. Kosson, Shock predictions in conical nozzles, AIAA Journal, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1554–1556, 1965, 0001-1452, doi: https://doi.org/10.2514/3.3206 5. [5] J. S. Paik, K. Am Park, and J. T. Park, Inter-laboratory comparison of sonic nozzles at KRISS, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 339–344, 2000, 0955-5986, doi: www.elsevier.com/locate/flowmeasinst
|
|