Prosthetic devices: Challenges and implications of robotic implants and biological interfaces

Author:

Lai J C K12,Schoen M P34,Gracia A Perez3,Naidu D S34,Leung S W32

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA

2. Biomedical Research Institute, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA

3. College of Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA

4. Measurement and Control Engineering Research Center, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA

Abstract

Although among designs of prosthetics there have been some successes in the design of functional robotic implants, there remain many issues and challenges concerned with the failure to meet the ‘ideal’ requirements of a satisfactory prosthetic. These ‘ideals’ require the device to be easy to control, comfortable to wear, and cosmetically pleasing. Because the literature on prosthetics and robotic implants are voluminous, this review focuses on four topics to determine key challenges and opportunities underlying these interdisciplinary research areas: firstly, an artificial hand as a biomimetic; secondly, prosthetic implants (electromyography signals and control); thirdly, prosthetic implants and tissue reactions to the material(s) of implants; fourthly, how inflammatory responses of cells and tissues surrounding implanted sensors interfere with the signal transmission of such sensors. This review also notes the importance of the biological interfaces that robotic implants and other prosthetic devices are in contact with and how an improved knowledge of pathophysiological changes at such biological interfaces will lead to improved and more biocompatible designs of prosthetics. This review concludes with the vision that, to develop a design that satisfies the above ‘ideals’, an interdisciplinary team of biomedical and tissue engineers, and biomaterial and biomedical scientists is needed to work together holistically and synergistically.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,General Medicine

Reference55 articles.

1. Experimental analysis and performance comparison of three different prosthetic hands designed according to a biomechatronic approach

2. Kyberd P. J., Pons J. L. A comparison of the Oxford and Manus intelligent hand prostheses. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and automation, 14–19 September 2003, vol. 3, pp. 3231–3236 (IEEE, New York).

3. Rodriguez-Cheu L. E., Casals A., Cuxart A., Parra A. Towards the definition of a functionality index for the quantitative evaluation of handprosthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE-RSJ International Conference on Intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2005), 2–6 August 2005, pp. 541–546 (IEEE, New York).

4. Active functional prostheses

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3